<dependency>
      <groupId>org.checkerframework</groupId>
      <artifactId>checker-qual</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.errorprone</groupId>
      <artifactId>error_prone_annotations</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.j2objc</groupId>
      <artifactId>j2objc-annotations</artifactId>
    </dependency>
  </dependencies>
  <build>

          </plugin>
        </plugins>
      </build>
    </profile>
    <profile>
      <id>run-error-prone</id>
      <activation>
        <!--
        Error Prone requires 11+: https://errorprone.info/docs/installation
        We skip 12-15 because of https://github.com/google/error-prone/issues/3540.
        -->
        <jdk>[11,12),[16,)</jdk>
      </activation>
      <build>
        <plugins>

    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.checkerframework</groupId>
      <artifactId>checker-qual</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.errorprone</groupId>
      <artifactId>error_prone_annotations</artifactId>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.j2objc</groupId>
      <artifactId>j2objc-annotations</artifactId>
    </dependency>
  </dependencies>
  <build>

            lines could make c.g.c.base.testModule transitively inherit from extra modules. If some
            of those modules are ones that it uses but forgets to list in its own <inherits>, we'd
            like to get an error. Currently we do, but if we add the extra <inherits> lines, we
            won't.

            I have one idea for a better approach, but it's painful, and I haven't tested it: We