* }
   *
   * <p>When selecting an executor, note that {@code directExecutor} is dangerous in some cases. See
   * the warnings the {@link MoreExecutors#directExecutor} documentation.
   *
   * <p>The returned {@code Future} attempts to keep its cancellation state in sync with that of the
   * input future and that of the future returned by the chain function. That is, if the returned

   * nullness checker can already "prove" are non-null. That means that the first parameter to
   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to

      } else if (thisSize < thatMinSize) {
        // this.size() < minSize(that) <= that.size()
        return false; // this.size() < that.size()
      } else { // that can only be a SetView at this point
        int thatSize = 0;
        for (Object unused : that) {
          if (++thatSize > thisSize) {
            return false;
          }
        }
        return true; // that.size() == this.size()
      }

 * API</h2>
 *
 * <p>The successor to Guava's caching API is <a
 * href="https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/wiki">Caffeine</a>. Its API is designed to make it a
 * nearly drop-in replacement. Note that it is not available for Android or GWT/J2CL and that it may
 * have <a href="https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/wiki/Guava">different (usually better)
 * behavior</a> when multiple threads attempt concurrent mutations. Its equivalent to {@code

    connections alive so applications that have many pools also risk exhausting
    memory!

    The best practice in OkHttp 3 is to create a single OkHttpClient instance
    and share it throughout the application. Requests that needs a customized
    client should call `OkHttpClient.newBuilder()` on that shared instance.
    This allows customization without the drawbacks of separate connection

   * nullness checker can already "prove" are non-null. That means that the first parameter to
   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to

	// 1.2 Check that svc account appears in listing
	c.assertSvcAccAppearsInListing(ctx, s.adm, accessKey, cr.AccessKey)

	// 1.3 Check that svc account info can be queried
	c.assertSvcAccInfoQueryable(ctx, s.adm, accessKey, cr.AccessKey, false)

	// 2. Check that svc account can access the bucket
	c.assertSvcAccS3Access(ctx, s, cr, bucket)

	// 3. Check that svc account can restrict the policy, and that the

    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns a builder that creates immutable sorted maps whose keys are ordered by their natural
   * ordering. The sorted maps use {@link Ordering#natural()} as the comparator.
   */
  public static <K extends Comparable<?>, V> Builder<K, V> naturalOrder() {
    return new Builder<>(Ordering.natural());
  }

  /**
   * Returns a builder that creates immutable sorted maps with an explicit comparator. If the

      } else if (thisSize < thatMinSize) {
        // this.size() < minSize(that) <= that.size()
        return false; // this.size() < that.size()
      } else { // that can only be a SetView at this point
        int thatSize = 0;
        for (Object unused : that) {
          if (++thatSize > thisSize) {
            return false;
          }
        }
        return true; // that.size() == this.size()
      }

    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns a builder that creates immutable sorted maps whose keys are ordered by their natural
   * ordering. The sorted maps use {@link Ordering#natural()} as the comparator.
   */
  public static <K extends Comparable<?>, V> Builder<K, V> naturalOrder() {
    return new Builder<>(Ordering.natural());
  }

  /**
   * Returns a builder that creates immutable sorted maps with an explicit comparator. If the