labels.excludedDocPaths=Ausgeschlossene Pfade für die Suche
labels.excludedDocUrls=Ausgeschlossene URLs für die Suche
labels.hostname=Hostname
labels.id=ID
labels.includedPaths=Eingeschlossene Pfade für das Crawling
labels.includedUrls=Eingeschlossene URLs für das Crawling
labels.includedDocPaths=Eingeschlossene Pfade für die Suche
labels.includedDocUrls=Eingeschlossene URLs für die Suche
labels.maxAccessCount=Maximale Zugriffsanzahl

   *
   * <p>When methods such as {@code removeAll()} and {@code clear()} are called on the filtered
   * multimap or its views, only mappings whose keys satisfy the filter will be removed from the
   * underlying multimap.
   *
   * <p>The returned multimap isn't threadsafe or serializable, even if {@code unfiltered} is.
   *
   * <p>Many of the filtered multimap's methods, such as {@code size()}, iterate across every

   *
   * <p>When methods such as {@code removeAll()} and {@code clear()} are called on the filtered
   * multimap or its views, only mappings whose keys satisfy the filter will be removed from the
   * underlying multimap.
   *
   * <p>The returned multimap isn't threadsafe or serializable, even if {@code unfiltered} is.
   *
   * <p>Many of the filtered multimap's methods, such as {@code size()}, iterate across every

  // way in such a visibility issue would surface is most likely as a failure of cancel() to
  // propagate to the input. Cancellation propagation is fundamentally racy so this is fine.
  //
  // Future versions of the JMM may revise safe construction semantics in such a way that we can
  // safely publish these objects and we won't need this whole discussion.

   * predicate}, or {@code -1} if the Iterator has no such elements.
   *
   * <p>More formally, returns the lowest index {@code i} such that {@code
   * predicate.apply(Iterators.get(iterator, i))} returns {@code true}, or {@code -1} if there is no
   * such index.
   *
   * <p>If -1 is returned, the iterator will be left exhausted: its {@code hasNext()} method will

   * predicate}, or {@code -1} if the Iterator has no such elements.
   *
   * <p>More formally, returns the lowest index {@code i} such that {@code
   * predicate.apply(Iterators.get(iterator, i))} returns {@code true}, or {@code -1} if there is no
   * such index.
   *
   * <p>If -1 is returned, the iterator will be left exhausted: its {@code hasNext()} method will

   * such as {@code removeAll()} and {@code clear()} are called on the filtered set, only elements
   * that satisfy the filter will be removed from the underlying set.
   *
   * <p>The returned set isn't threadsafe or serializable, even if {@code unfiltered} is.
   *
   * <p>Many of the filtered set's methods, such as {@code size()}, iterate across every element in

   * such as {@code removeAll()} and {@code clear()} are called on the filtered set, only elements
   * that satisfy the filter will be removed from the underlying set.
   *
   * <p>The returned set isn't threadsafe or serializable, even if {@code unfiltered} is.
   *
   * <p>Many of the filtered set's methods, such as {@code size()}, iterate across every element in

 * them, even though they usually won't be needed. If you have such arguments, use the conventional
 * if/throw idiom instead.
 *
 * <p>Depending on your message arguments, memory may be allocated for boxing and varargs array
 * creation. However, the methods of this class have a large number of overloads that prevent such
 * allocations in many common cases.
 *

    `requestBodyEnd()`, both on the same call. Such events may be triggered by different threads
    even for a single call.

    Interceptors that rewrite or replace the request body may now inadvertently interfere with
    duplex request bodies. Such interceptors should check `RequestBody.isDuplex()` and avoid
    accessing the request body when it is.