//  noutputs - number of elements in `outputs` array
//  outputs - array of TF_Outputs that specify the outputs of the function.
//            If `noutputs` is zero (the function returns no outputs), `outputs`
//            can be null. `outputs` can contain the same tensor more than once.
//  output_names - The names of the function's outputs. `output_names` array

                         const std::vector<IOSpec>& outputs) {
    const OpDef& signature = fdef.signature();
    ASSERT_EQ(outputs.size(), signature.output_arg_size());
    for (int i = 0; i < outputs.size(); ++i) {
      const OpDef::ArgDef& arg = signature.output_arg(i);
      const IOSpec& out = outputs[i];
      if (out.second != DT_INVALID) {
        ASSERT_EQ(arg.type(), out.second)

    TF_Output inputs[2];
    TF_Output outputs[1];
    TF_Output grad_outputs[2];

    BuildSuccessGraph(inputs, outputs);

    AddGradients(false, prefix1, inputs, 2, outputs, 1, grad_outputs);
    if (prefix2 != nullptr) {
      AddGradients(false, prefix2, inputs, 2, outputs, 1, grad_outputs);
    }
  }

  TF_Status* s_;
  TF_Graph* graph_;

	endpointConfigCmd := &cobra.Command{
		Use: "eds [<type>/]<name>[.<namespace>]",
		// Currently, we have an "endpoints" and "eds" command. While for simple use cases these are nearly identical, they give
		// pretty different outputs for the full JSON output. This makes it a useful command for developers, but may be overwhelming
		// for basic usage. For now, hide to avoid confusion.
		Hidden: true,

    /*
     * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept
     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable

    /*
     * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept
     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable

	p := make([]*Type, len(dtype.ParamType))
	gp := make([]*ast.Field, len(dtype.ParamType))
	for i, f := range dtype.ParamType {
		// gcc's DWARF generator outputs a single DotDotDotType parameter for
		// function pointers that specify no parameters (e.g. void
		// (*__cgo_0)()).  Treat this special case as void. This case is