* entries may be counted in {@link Cache#size}, but will never be visible to read or write
 * operations.
 *
 * <p>Certain cache configurations will result in the accrual of periodic maintenance tasks which
 * will be performed during write operations, or during occasional read operations in the absence of
 * writes. The {@link Cache#cleanUp} method of the returned cache will also perform maintenance, but

   * An object that holds the final result of an asynchronous {@link ClosingFuture} operation and
   * allows the user to close all the closeable objects that were captured during it for later
   * closing.
   *
   * <p>The asynchronous operation will have completed before this object is created.
   *
   * @param <V> the type of the value of a successful operation
   * @see ClosingFuture#finishToValueAndCloser(ValueAndCloserConsumer, Executor)

 * entries may be counted in {@link Cache#size}, but will never be visible to read or write
 * operations.
 *
 * <p>Certain cache configurations will result in the accrual of periodic maintenance tasks which
 * will be performed during write operations, or during occasional read operations in the absence of
 * writes. The {@link Cache#cleanUp} method of the returned cache will also perform maintenance, but

```
redis-cli -a yoursecret
127.0.0.1:6379> monitor
OK
```

Open another terminal and upload a JPEG image into `images` bucket.

```
mc cp myphoto.jpg myminio/images
```

In the previous terminal, you will now see the operation that MinIO performs on Redis:

```
127.0.0.1:6379> monitor

   * {@code factory}, and the multimap contents are all serializable.
   *
   * <p>The multimap is not threadsafe when any concurrent operations update the multimap, even if
   * {@code map} and the instances generated by {@code factory} are. Concurrent read operations will
   * work correctly. To allow concurrent update operations, wrap the multimap with a call to {@link
   * #synchronizedMultimap}.
   *

import jcifs.context.BaseContext;
import jcifs.context.SingletonContext;

/**
 * Integration tests for SmbFile using a real SMB server via Testcontainers.
 * These tests validate actual SMB protocol operations against dperson/samba:latest.
 */
@Testcontainers
@TestInstance(TestInstance.Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
@TestMethodOrder(MethodOrderer.MethodName.class)
class SmbFileIntegrationTest {

     * read operations anyway:
     *
     * - All (unsynchronized) read operations must first read the "count" field, and should not
     * look at table entries if it is 0.
     *
     * - All (synchronized) write operations should write to the "count" field after structurally
     * changing any bin. The operations must not take any action that could even momentarily

	writeSuccessResponseXML(w, encodedSuccessResponse)
}

// HeadBucketHandler - HEAD Bucket
// ----------
// This operation is useful to determine if a bucket exists.
// The operation returns a 200 OK if the bucket exists and you
// have permission to access it. Otherwise, the operation might
// return responses such as 404 Not Found and 403 Forbidden.

import jakarta.servlet.FilterChain;
import jakarta.servlet.ServletException;
import jakarta.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest;
import jakarta.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse;

/**
 * The API manager for search operations.
 */
public class SearchApiManager extends BaseApiManager {

    private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(SearchApiManager.class);

    /**
     * The message field.
     */

  //
  // For the time being we are OK with the problem discussed above since it requires a caller to
  // introduce a very specific kind of data-race. And given the other operations performed by these
  // methods that involve volatile read/write operations, in practice there is no issue. Also, the
  // way in such a visibility issue would surface is most likely as a failure of cancel() to