}
	}
}

func TestXLStorageIsDirEmpty(t *testing.T) {
	tmp := t.TempDir()

	// Should give false on non-existent directory.
	dir1 := slashpath.Join(tmp, "non-existent-directory")
	if isDirEmpty(dir1, true) {
		t.Error("expected false for non-existent directory, got true")
	}

	// Should give false for not-a-directory.
	dir2 := slashpath.Join(tmp, "file")

 *  The challenge's scheme and realm are now non-null. If you are calling
    `new Challenge(scheme, realm)` you must provide non-null values. These were
    never null in challenges created by OkHttp, but could have been null in
    application code that creates challenges.

 *  New: The `TlsVersion` of a `Handshake` is now non-null. If you are calling

    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Not supported. <b>You are attempting to create a map that may contain a non-{@code Comparable}
   * key.</b> Proper calls will resolve to the version in {@code ImmutableSortedMap}, not this dummy
   * version.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always

  }

  @Test
  fun parseHostAsciiNonPrintable() {
    val host = "host\u0001"
    assertInvalid("http://$host/", "Invalid URL host: \"host\u0001\"")
    // TODO make exception message escape non-printable characters
  }

  @Test
  fun parseDoesNotTrimOtherWhitespaceCharacters() {
    // Whitespace characters list from Google's Guava team: http://goo.gl/IcR9RD
    // line tabulation

    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Not supported. <b>You are attempting to create a map that may contain a non-{@code Comparable}
   * key.</b> Proper calls will resolve to the version in {@code ImmutableSortedMap}, not this dummy
   * version.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always

   * nullness checker can already "prove" are non-null. That means that the first parameter to
   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to

                try {
                    model = modelProcessor.read(modelSource.getInputStream(), options);
                } catch (ModelParseException ne) {
                    // still unreadable even in non-strict mode, rethrow original error
                    throw e;
                }

                if (pomFile != null) {
                    problems.add(new ModelProblemCollectorRequest(Severity.ERROR, Version.V20)

	}
	if len(versions) == 1 {
		return versions[0]
	}
	if quorum == 1 {
		// No need for non-strict checks if quorum is 1.
		strict = true
	}
	// Shallow copy input
	versions = append(make([][]xlMetaV2ShallowVersion, 0, len(versions)), versions...)

	var nVersions int // captures all non-free versions

	// Our result
	merged = make([]xlMetaV2ShallowVersion, 0, len(versions[0]))

   * nullness checker can already "prove" are non-null. That means that the first parameter to
   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to

// If this function succeeds:
//   * *status is set to an OK value,
//   * a TF_Operation is added to the graph,
//   * a non-null value pointing to the added operation is returned --
//     this value is valid until the underlying graph is deleted.
// Otherwise:
//   * *status is set to a non-OK value,
//   * the graph is not modified,
//   * a null value is returned.
// In either case, it deletes `desc`.