// TODO(user,lukes): consider adding volatile to all these fields since in current known JVMs
  // that should resolve the issue. This comes at the cost of adding more write barriers to the
  // implementations.

  private Futures() {}

  /**
   * Creates a {@code ListenableFuture} which has its value set immediately upon construction. The

   * corresponding {@link InternalEntry}, {@link Segment}, and {@link InternalEntryHelper}
   * implementations.
   *
   * @param <K> the type of the key in each entry
   * @param <V> the type of the value in each entry
   * @param <E> the type of the {@link InternalEntry} entry implementation
   * @param <S> the type of the {@link Segment} entry implementation
   */
  interface InternalEntryHelper<

   * CacheLoader#reload}.
   *
   * <p>As the default implementation of {@link CacheLoader#reload} is synchronous, it is
   * recommended that users of this method override {@link CacheLoader#reload} with an asynchronous
   * implementation; otherwise refreshes will be performed during unrelated cache read and write
   * operations.
   *

    /**
     * Configure a single client scoped listener that will receive all analytic events for this
     * client.
     *
     * @see EventListener for semantics and restrictions on listener implementations.
     */
    fun eventListener(eventListener: EventListener) =
      apply {
        this.eventListenerFactory = eventListener.asFactory()
      }

    /**

    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return "CharMatcher.or(" + first + ", " + second + ")";
    }
  }

  // Static factory implementations

  /** Implementation of {@link #is(char)}. */
  private static final class Is extends FastMatcher {

    private final char match;

    Is(char match) {
      this.match = match;
    }

   * returned to the caller, although this is neither guaranteed to occur nor required to be
   * consistent. For example, this method <i>might</i> choose to pass through recognized
   * implementations of {@code PeekingIterator} when the behavior of the implementation is known to
   * meet the contract guaranteed by this method.
   *
   * <p>There is no {@link Iterable} equivalent to this method, so use this method to wrap each

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Test cases for {@link TypeToken}.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Ben Yu
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // lots of failures, possibly some related to bad equals() implementations?
@NullUnmarked
public class TypeTokenTest extends TestCase {

  private abstract static class StringList implements List<String> {}

  private abstract static class IntegerList implements List<Integer> {}

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Test cases for {@link TypeToken}.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Ben Yu
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // lots of failures, possibly some related to bad equals() implementations?
@NullUnmarked
public class TypeTokenTest extends TestCase {

  private abstract static class StringList implements List<String> {}

  private abstract static class IntegerList implements List<Integer> {}

  }

  /**
   * Returns {@link Multimap#asMap multimap.asMap()}. This is provided for parity with the other
   * more strongly-typed {@code asMap()} implementations.
   *
   * @since 15.0
   */
  public static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap(Multimap<K, V> multimap) {
    return multimap.asMap();
  }

  }

  /**
   * Returns {@link Multimap#asMap multimap.asMap()}. This is provided for parity with the other
   * more strongly-typed {@code asMap()} implementations.
   *
   * @since 15.0
   */
  public static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap(Multimap<K, V> multimap) {
    return multimap.asMap();
  }