assertEquals("b", consumingIterator.next());
    assertThat(list).isEmpty();

    assertFalse(consumingIterator.hasNext());
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // ?
  // TODO: Figure out why this is failing in GWT.
  public void testConsumingIterator_duelingIterators() {
    // Test data
    List<String> list = Lists.newArrayList("a", "b");

    // Test & Verify

    assertEquals("b", consumingIterator.next());
    assertThat(list).isEmpty();

    assertFalse(consumingIterator.hasNext());
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // ?
  // TODO: Figure out why this is failing in GWT.
  public void testConsumingIterator_duelingIterators() {
    // Test data
    List<String> list = Lists.newArrayList("a", "b");

    // Test & Verify

	// errors on a previous write(2) operation are reported only on the final close() that releases
	// the open file descriptor.
	//
	// Failing to check the return value when closing a file may lead to silent loss of data.
	// This can especially be observed with NFS and with disk quota.
	return w.Close()
}

 *  The challenge's scheme and realm are now non-null. If you are calling
    `new Challenge(scheme, realm)` you must provide non-null values. These were
    never null in challenges created by OkHttp, but could have been null in
    application code that creates challenges.

 *  New: The `TlsVersion` of a `Handshake` is now non-null. If you are calling
    `Handshake.get()` with a null TLS version, you must instead now provide a

* oidc authentication plugin: don't trim issuer URLs with trailing slashes ([#29860](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29860), [@ericchiang](https://github.com/ericchiang))
* network/cni: Bring up the `lo` interface for rkt ([#29310](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29310), [@euank](https://github.com/euank))

     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *

     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public E floor(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.floor(e);
    }

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public E ceiling(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.ceiling(e);
    }

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public E higher(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.higher(e);
    }

    @Override

	"testing"

	"github.com/dustin/go-humanize"
	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/config/storageclass"
	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/hash"
	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/ioutil"
)

// Wrapper for calling NewMultipartUpload tests for both Erasure multiple disks and single node setup.
func TestObjectNewMultipartUpload(t *testing.T) {
	if runtime.GOOS == globalWindowsOSName {
		t.Skip()
	}

 * will be performed during write operations, or during occasional read operations in the absence of
 * writes. The {@link Cache#cleanUp} method of the returned cache will also perform maintenance, but
 * calling it should not be necessary with a high throughput cache. Only caches built with {@link
 * #removalListener removalListener}, {@link #expireAfterWrite expireAfterWrite}, {@link