assertThat(consumingIterator.next()).isEqualTo("b");
    assertThat(list).isEmpty();

    assertFalse(consumingIterator.hasNext());
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // ?
  // TODO: Figure out why this is failing in GWT.
  public void testConsumingIterator_duelingIterators() {
    // Test data
    List<String> list = Lists.newArrayList("a", "b");

    // Test & Verify

	// errors on a previous write(2) operation are reported only on the final close() that releases
	// the open file descriptor.
	//
	// Failing to check the return value when closing a file may lead to silent loss of data.
	// This can especially be observed with NFS and with disk quota.
	return w.Close()
}

    assertThat(consumingIterator.next()).isEqualTo("b");
    assertThat(list).isEmpty();

    assertFalse(consumingIterator.hasNext());
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // ?
  // TODO: Figure out why this is failing in GWT.
  public void testConsumingIterator_duelingIterators() {
    // Test data
    List<String> list = Lists.newArrayList("a", "b");

    // Test & Verify

 *  The challenge's scheme and realm are now non-null. If you are calling
    `new Challenge(scheme, realm)` you must provide non-null values. These were
    never null in challenges created by OkHttp, but could have been null in
    application code that creates challenges.

 *  New: The `TlsVersion` of a `Handshake` is now non-null. If you are calling
    `Handshake.get()` with a null TLS version, you must instead now provide a

* oidc authentication plugin: don't trim issuer URLs with trailing slashes ([#29860](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29860), [@ericchiang](https://github.com/ericchiang))
* network/cni: Bring up the `lo` interface for rkt ([#29310](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29310), [@euank](https://github.com/euank))

        } catch (RuntimeException e) {
            log.warn("SMB server readiness check failed: {}", e.getMessage());
            // In CI environments or when Docker is not properly set up, skip the tests instead of failing
            assumeTrue(false, "SMB server not ready - skipping integration tests: " + e.getMessage());
        }
    }

    @AfterAll
    void teardownContainer() throws Exception {

     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *

          Platform.lenientFormat(errorMessageTemplate, p1, p2, p3, p4));
    }
  }

  /**
   * Ensures the truth of an expression involving the state of the calling instance, but not
   * involving any parameters to the calling method.
   *
   * @param expression a boolean expression
   * @throws IllegalStateException if {@code expression} is false
   * @see Verify#verify Verify.verify()
   */

          Platform.lenientFormat(errorMessageTemplate, p1, p2, p3, p4));
    }
  }

  /**
   * Ensures the truth of an expression involving the state of the calling instance, but not
   * involving any parameters to the calling method.
   *
   * @param expression a boolean expression
   * @throws IllegalStateException if {@code expression} is false
   * @see Verify#verify Verify.verify()
   */

    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E floor(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.floor(e);
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E ceiling(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.ceiling(e);
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E higher(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.higher(e);
    }

    @Override