bucketsToBeUpdated.Add(bucket)
				continue
			}
			if !globalDomainIPs.Intersection(set.CreateStringSet(getHostsSlice(r)...)).IsEmpty() {
				if globalDomainIPs.Difference(set.CreateStringSet(getHostsSlice(r)...)).IsEmpty() && !domainMissing {
					// No difference in terms of domainIPs and nothing
					// has changed so we don't change anything on the etcd.
					//
					// Additionally also check if domain is updated/missing with more

	policiesToUpdate := set.CreateStringSet(policies...)
	var newPolicySet set.StringSet
	newPolicyMapping := mp
	if isAttach {
		// new policies to attach => inputPolicies - existing (set difference)
		policiesToUpdate = policiesToUpdate.Difference(existingPolicySet)
		// validate that new policies to add are defined.
		for _, p := range policiesToUpdate.ToSlice() {
			if _, found := cache.iamPolicyDocsMap[p]; !found {

        return set1.containsAll(collection) && set2.containsAll(collection);
      }
    };
  }

  /**
   * Returns an unmodifiable <b>view</b> of the difference of two sets. The returned set contains
   * all elements that are contained by {@code set1} and not contained by {@code set2}. {@code set2}

     * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept
     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?

     * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept
     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?

            """
        ),
    ] = True,
) -> Any:
    """
    Declare a FastAPI Security dependency.

    The only difference with a regular dependency is that it can declare OAuth2
    scopes that will be integrated with OpenAPI and the automatic UI docs (by default
    at `/docs`).

}

func (s *peerRESTServer) writeErrorResponse(w http.ResponseWriter, err error) {
	w.WriteHeader(http.StatusForbidden)
	w.Write([]byte(err.Error()))
}

// IsValid - To authenticate and verify the time difference.
func (s *peerRESTServer) IsValid(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) bool {
	if err := storageServerRequestValidate(r); err != nil {
		s.writeErrorResponse(w, err)
		return false
	}
	return true
}

		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusPreconditionFailed,
	},
	ErrRequestTimeTooSkewed: {
		Code:           "RequestTimeTooSkewed",
		Description:    "The difference between the request time and the server's time is too large.",
		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusForbidden,
	},
	ErrSignatureDoesNotMatch: {
		Code:           "SignatureDoesNotMatch",

   *
   * <p>As we iterate from {@code 0} to {@code nThreads}, threads with an even index will call
   * {@code getUnchecked}, and threads with an odd index will call {@code get}. If the cache throws
   * exceptions, this difference may be visible in the returned List.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("ThreadPriorityCheck") // TODO: b/175898629 - Consider onSpinWait.
  private static <K> List<Object> doConcurrentGet(
      final LoadingCache<K, ?> cache,

		validPolicies, _ := sys.store.MergePolicies(rolePolicies)
		knownPoliciesSet := newMappedPolicy(validPolicies).policySet()
		unknownPoliciesSet := specifiedPoliciesSet.Difference(knownPoliciesSet)
		if len(unknownPoliciesSet) > 0 {
			authz := newGlobalAuthZPluginFn()
			if authz == nil {
				// Print a warning that some policies mapped to a role are not defined.
				errMsg := fmt.Errorf(