MapDifference<Integer, String> original = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> same = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> reverse = Maps.difference(right, left);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> diff2 = Maps.difference(left, right2);

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(original, same)

        return set1.contains(element) ^ set2.contains(element);
      }

      @Override
      int minSize() {
        int difference = minSize(set1) - maxSize(set2);
        return difference >= 0 ? difference : max(minSize(set2) - maxSize(set1), 0);
      }

      @Override
      int maxSize() {
        return saturatedAdd(maxSize(set1), maxSize(set2));
      }

    MapDifference<Integer, String> original = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> same = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> reverse = Maps.difference(right, left);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> diff2 = Maps.difference(left, right2);

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(original, same)

     * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept
     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?

 * ## Why another URL model?
 *
 * Java includes both [java.net.URL][URL] and [java.net.URI][URI]. We offer a new URL
 * model to address problems that the others don't.
 *
 * ### Different URLs should be different
 *
 * Although they have different content, `java.net.URL` considers the following two URLs
 * equal, and the [equals()][Object.equals] method between them returns true:
 *
 *  * https://example.net/
 *

   * DeferredCloser} to capture objects to be closed when the pipeline is done.
   *
   * <p>If this {@code ClosingFuture} succeeds or fails with a different exception type, the
   * function will not be called, and the derived {@code ClosingFuture} will be equivalent to this
   * one.
   *

    }

    @Test
    void testFileRename() throws Exception {
        long timestamp = System.currentTimeMillis();

        // Use separate contexts for different operations
        CIFSContext createContext = createFreshContext();
        String sourceFileName = "source_" + timestamp + ".txt";
        String targetFileName = "target_" + timestamp + ".txt";

    assertFalse(elementsEqual(b.iterator(), a.iterator()));

    // Different lengths.
    a = asList(4, 8, 15, 16, 23);
    b = asList(4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42);
    assertFalse(elementsEqual(a.iterator(), b.iterator()));
    assertFalse(elementsEqual(b.iterator(), a.iterator()));

    // Different lengths, one is empty.
    a = emptySet();
    b = asList(4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42);

    }

    /**
     * Handle client move events
     */
    private void handleClientMove(WitnessNotification notification) {
        // Server is asking client to move to different node
        log.info("Client move requested for resource: {}", notification.getResourceName());

        List<WitnessNotification.WitnessIPAddress> newAddresses = notification.getNewIPAddresses();

   * order. They also specify the behavior of the {@code equals}, {@code hashCode}, and {@code
   * toString} methods for the multimap and its returned views. However, the multimap's {@code get}
   * method returns instances of a different class than {@code factory.get()} does.
   *
   * <p>The multimap is serializable if {@code map}, {@code factory}, the collections generated by
   * {@code factory}, and the multimap contents are all serializable.
   *