return set1.contains(element) ^ set2.contains(element);
      }

      @Override
      int minSize() {
        int difference = minSize(set1) - maxSize(set2);
        return difference >= 0 ? difference : max(minSize(set2) - maxSize(set1), 0);
      }

      @Override
      int maxSize() {
        return saturatedAdd(maxSize(set1), maxSize(set2));
      }

    MapDifference<Integer, String> original = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> same = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> reverse = Maps.difference(right, left);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> diff2 = Maps.difference(left, right2);

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(original, same)

    MapDifference<Integer, String> original = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> same = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> reverse = Maps.difference(right, left);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> diff2 = Maps.difference(left, right2);

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(original, same)

				// but if we do see a difference with local domain IPs with
				// hostSlice from etcd then we should update with newer
				// domainIPs, we proceed to do that here.
				bucketsToBeUpdated.Add(bucket)
				continue
			}

			// No IPs seem to intersect, this means that bucket exists but has
			// different IP addresses perhaps from a different deployment.

     * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept
     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?

 * ## Why another URL model?
 *
 * Java includes both [java.net.URL][URL] and [java.net.URI][URI]. We offer a new URL
 * model to address problems that the others don't.
 *
 * ### Different URLs should be different
 *
 * Although they have different content, `java.net.URL` considers the following two URLs
 * equal, and the [equals()][Object.equals] method between them returns true:
 *
 *  * https://example.net/
 *

   * DeferredCloser} to capture objects to be closed when the pipeline is done.
   *
   * <p>If this {@code ClosingFuture} succeeds or fails with a different exception type, the
   * function will not be called, and the derived {@code ClosingFuture} will be equivalent to this
   * one.
   *

)

func init() {
	binary.LittleEndian.PutUint16(xlVersionCurrent[0:2], xlVersionMajor)
	binary.LittleEndian.PutUint16(xlVersionCurrent[2:4], xlVersionMinor)
}

// The []journal contains all the different versions of the object.
//
// This array can have 3 kinds of objects:
//
// ``object``: If the object is uploaded the usual way: putobject, multipart-put, copyobject
//
// ``delete``: This is the delete-marker
//

	policiesToUpdate := set.CreateStringSet(policies...)
	var newPolicySet set.StringSet
	newPolicyMapping := mp
	if isAttach {
		// new policies to attach => inputPolicies - existing (set difference)
		policiesToUpdate = policiesToUpdate.Difference(existingPolicySet)
		// validate that new policies to add are defined.
		for _, p := range policiesToUpdate.ToSlice() {
			if _, found := cache.iamPolicyDocsMap[p]; !found {

    }

    @Test
    void testFileRename() throws Exception {
        long timestamp = System.currentTimeMillis();

        // Use separate contexts for different operations
        CIFSContext createContext = createFreshContext();
        String sourceFileName = "source_" + timestamp + ".txt";
        String targetFileName = "target_" + timestamp + ".txt";