"application/vnd.unity",
				"application/vnd.uoml+xml",
				"application/vnd.uplanet.alert",
				"application/vnd.uplanet.alert-wbxml",
				"application/vnd.uplanet.bearer-choice",
				"application/vnd.uplanet.bearer-choice-wbxml",
				"application/vnd.uplanet.cacheop",
				"application/vnd.uplanet.cacheop-wbxml",
				"application/vnd.uplanet.channel",
				"application/vnd.uplanet.channel-wbxml",

     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *
     * On the other hand, the current signature is consistent with the similar allAsList method. And
     * eventually this method may go away entirely in favor of an API like

                  for the availability of IPs sorting the matching IPAddressPools
                  by priority, starting from the highest to the lowest. If multiple
                  IPAddressPools have the same priority, choice will be random.
                properties:
                  namespaceSelectors:
                    description: NamespaceSelectors list of label selectors to select

     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *
     * On the other hand, the current signature is consistent with the similar allAsList method. And
     * eventually this method may go away entirely in favor of an API like

	total := serverPools.TotalAvailable()
	if total == 0 {
		return -1
	}
	// choose when we reach this many
	choose := rand.Uint64() % total
	atTotal := uint64(0)
	for _, pool := range serverPools {
		atTotal += pool.Available
		if atTotal > choose && pool.Available > 0 {
			return pool.Index
		}
	}
	// Should not happen, but print values just in case.

      public void run() {
        thirdSignal.countDown();
        result.set(1, cache.getUnchecked(key));
        doneSignal.countDown();
      }
    }.start();

    // give the second get a chance to run; it is okay for this to be racy
    // as the end result should be the same either way
    thirdSignal.await();
    Thread.yield();

    // Expand!
    CacheTesting.forceExpandSegment(cache, key);

   * without contention. Because assignment of entries to these partitions is not necessarily
   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead

   * cartesian set is constructed, the input sets are merely copied. Only as the resulting set is
   * iterated are the individual lists created, and these are not retained after iteration.
   *
   * @param sets the sets to choose elements from, in the order that the elements chosen from those
   *     sets should appear in the resulting lists
   * @param <B> any common base class shared by all axes (often just {@link Object})

   * without contention. Because assignment of entries to these partitions is not necessarily
   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead

   * returned to the caller, although this is neither guaranteed to occur nor required to be
   * consistent. For example, this method <i>might</i> choose to pass through recognized
   * implementations of {@code PeekingIterator} when the behavior of the implementation is known to
   * meet the contract guaranteed by this method.
   *