labels.diagnostic_logs=Diagnostik
labels.download_diagnostic_logs_button=Unduh Log
labels.reload_doc_index=Muat Ulang Indeks Dokumen
labels.reload_doc_index_button=Muat Ulang
labels.rebuild_config_index=Bangun Ulang Indeks Konfigurasi
labels.rebuild_config_index_button=Bangun Ulang
labels.load_bulk_data=Muat Data Bawaan
labels.rebuild_target_indices=Indeks Target

			t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected to pass, but failed with: <ERROR> %s.", i+1, instanceType, actualErr.Error())
		}
		if actualErr == nil && !testCase.shouldPass {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected to fail with <ERROR> \"%s\", but passed instead.", i+1, instanceType, testCase.expectedError.Error())
		}
		// Failed as expected, but does it fail for the expected reason.
		if actualErr != nil && !testCase.shouldPass {

			if err != nil && testCase.shouldPass {
				t.Errorf("Test %d: %s:  Expected to pass, but failed with: <ERROR> %s", i+1, instanceType, err.Error())
			}
			if err == nil && !testCase.shouldPass {
				t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected to fail with <ERROR> \"%s\", but passed instead", i+1, instanceType, testCase.err.Error())
			}
			// Failed as expected, but does it fail for the expected reason.
			if err != nil && !testCase.shouldPass {

	if res.Nickname != user.Name {
		t.Errorf("Expected res.Nickname to be %s, but got %s", user.Name, res.Nickname)
	}
	if res.Name != "" {
		t.Errorf("Expected res.Name to be empty, but got %s", res.Name)
	}
	if res.Age != user.Age {
		t.Errorf("Expected res.Age to be %d, but got %d", user.Age, res.Age)
	}
}

func TestPluckWithSelect(t *testing.T) {
	users := []User{

 * entries may be counted in {@link Cache#size}, but will never be visible to read or write
 * operations.
 *
 * <p>Certain cache configurations will result in the accrual of periodic maintenance tasks which
 * will be performed during write operations, or during occasional read operations in the absence of
 * writes. The {@link Cache#cleanUp} method of the returned cache will also perform maintenance, but

   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *
   * The coding pattern above is heavily used in java.util, e.g. in ArrayList. There is a
   * RangeCheckMicroBenchmark in the JDK that was used to test this.
   *
   * But the methods in this class want to throw different exceptions, depending on the args, so it

	evt := evts[0]
	if evt.Action != TransitionAction {
		t.Fatalf("Expected action: %s but got %s", TransitionAction, evt.Action)
	}
	if evt.StorageClass != "TIER-1" {
		t.Fatalf("Expected TIER-1 but got %s", evt.StorageClass)
	}

	evt = evts[1]
	if evt.Action != TransitionVersionAction {
		t.Fatalf("Expected action: %s but got %s", TransitionVersionAction, evt.Action)
	}
	if evt.StorageClass != "TIER-2" {

   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *
   * The coding pattern above is heavily used in java.util, e.g. in ArrayList. There is a
   * RangeCheckMicroBenchmark in the JDK that was used to test this.
   *
   * But the methods in this class want to throw different exceptions, depending on the args, so it

                            errOn30,
                            Version.V20,
                            "profiles.profile.id",
                            null,
                            "must be unique but found duplicate profile with id " + profile.getId(),
                            profile);
                }

                validate30RawProfileActivation(problems, profile.getActivation(), prefix);

	}

	if tableType.Schema() != tblSchema {
		t.Fatalf("expected tblSchema to be %s but got %s", tblSchema, tableType.Schema())
	}

	if tableType.Name() != tblName {
		t.Fatalf("expected table name to be %s but got %s", tblName, tableType.Name())
	}

	if tableType.Type() != tblType {
		t.Fatalf("expected table type to be %s but got %s", tblType, tableType.Type())
	}

	comment, ok := tableType.Comment()