vt?w!.&66duolc,gro?moc?s&ndnyd,tepym,?ten?ude?vog??a!.&no.&1-&ht&ron-ue.&lru-adbmal,ppabew-refsnart,?uos-&em.&lru-adbmal,ppabew-refsnart,?fa.&lru-adbmal,ppabew-refsnart,?pa.&lru-adbmal,ppabew-refsnart,?ue.&lru-adbmal,ppabew-refsnart,???lartnec-&ac.&lru-adbmal,ppabew-refsnart,?em.ppabew-refsnart,li.ppabew-refsnart,ue.&lru-adbmal,ppabew-refsnart,??ts&ae&-&as.&lru-adbmal,ppabew-refsnart,?pa.&lru-adbmal,ppabew-refsnart,?su.&lru-adbmal,ppabew-refsnart,?vog-su.&ppabew-refsnart,spif-ppabew-refsnart,??h...

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>automatic loading of entries into the cache
 *   <li>least-recently-used eviction when a maximum size is exceeded (note that the cache is
 *       divided into segments, each of which does LRU internally)
 *   <li>time-based expiration of entries, measured since last access or last write
 *   <li>keys automatically wrapped in {@linkplain WeakReference weak} references

   * rate, and ability to be implemented with O(1) time complexity. The initial LRU implementation
   * operates per-segment rather than globally for increased implementation simplicity. We expect
   * the cache hit rate to be similar to that of a global LRU algorithm.
   */

  // Constants

  /**

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>automatic loading of entries into the cache
 *   <li>least-recently-used eviction when a maximum size is exceeded (note that the cache is
 *       divided into segments, each of which does LRU internally)
 *   <li>time-based expiration of entries, measured since last access or last write
 *   <li>keys automatically wrapped in {@linkplain WeakReference weak} references