}

    @Override
    protected SortedSet<E> delegate() {
      return unmodifiableDelegate;
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E lower(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.lower(e);
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E floor(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.floor(e);
    }

    @Override

		nsUnlocker = func() { lock.RUnlock(lkctx) }
		unlockOnDefer = true
	}

	checkPrecondFn := opts.CheckPrecondFn
	opts.CheckPrecondFn = nil // do not need to apply pre-conditions at lower layer.
	opts.NoLock = true        // no locks needed at lower levels for getObjectInfo()
	objInfo, zIdx, err := z.getLatestObjectInfoWithIdx(ctx, bucket, object, opts)
	if err != nil {
		if objInfo.DeleteMarker {
			if opts.VersionID == "" {

	}
	// Prefer newest modtime.
	if x.ModTime != o.ModTime {
		return x.ModTime > o.ModTime
	}

	// The following doesn't make too much sense, but we want sort to be consistent nonetheless.
	// Prefer lower types
	if x.Type != o.Type {
		return x.Type < o.Type
	}
	// Consistent sort on signature
	if v := bytes.Compare(x.Signature[:], o.Signature[:]); v != 0 {
		return v > 0
	}
	// On ID mismatch

    public @Nullable E higher(E e) {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().higher(e);
      }
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E lower(E e) {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().lower(e);
      }
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E pollFirst() {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().pollFirst();
      }
    }

    public @Nullable E higher(E e) {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().higher(e);
      }
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E lower(E e) {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().lower(e);
      }
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E pollFirst() {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().pollFirst();
      }
    }

   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not
   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the cache

        return new ArrayDeque<>(c);
    }

    /**
     * Creates and returns a new instance of {@link ArrayDeque}.
     *
     * @param <E> the element type of {@link ArrayDeque}
     * @param numElements the lower bound of the initial capacity range for the deque
     * @return a new instance of {@link ArrayDeque}
     * @see ArrayDeque#ArrayDeque(int)
     */
    public static <E> ArrayDeque<E> newArrayDeque(final int numElements) {

   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not
   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the cache

		},
		{
			name:       "lower-case-is",
			query:      `select * from s3object[*] as s where s.request.header['User-Agent'] is not null`,
			wantResult: `{"request":{"uri":"/1","header":{"User-Agent":"test"}}}`,

			markDelete = false
		}
		if opts.VersionPurgeStatus() == replication.VersionPurgeComplete {
			markDelete = false
		}
		// now, since VersionPurgeStatus() is already set, we can let the
		// lower layers decide this. This fixes a regression that was introduced
		// in PR #14555 where !VersionPurgeStatus.Empty() is automatically
		// considered as Delete marker true to avoid listing such objects by