import com.google.common.testing.NullPointerTester;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.ConcurrentModificationException;
import java.util.Enumeration;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.LinkedHashSet;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.ListIterator;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;

import com.google.common.testing.NullPointerTester;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.ConcurrentModificationException;
import java.util.Enumeration;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.LinkedHashSet;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.ListIterator;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;

import com.google.j2objc.annotations.J2ObjCIncompatible;
import java.lang.ref.SoftReference;
import java.lang.ref.WeakReference;
import java.time.Duration;
import java.util.ConcurrentModificationException;
import java.util.IdentityHashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.logging.Level;
import java.util.logging.Logger;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

         * element anymore. Otherwise, when we remove from the old iterator, we may be invalidating
         * the new one. The result is a ConcurrentModificationException or other bad behavior.
         *
         * (If we decide that we really, really hate allocating two Iterators per cycle instead of