} else {
						if hash&newbit != 0 {
							useY = 1
						}
					}
				}

				if evacuatedX+1 != evacuatedY || evacuatedX^1 != evacuatedY {
					throw("bad evacuatedN")
				}

				b.tophash[i] = evacuatedX + useY // evacuatedX + 1 == evacuatedY
				dst := &xy[useY]                 // evacuation destination

				if dst.i == abi.MapBucketCount {

  // Required.
  optional string key = 1;

  // valueExpression represents the expression which is evaluated by CEL to
  // produce an audit annotation value. The expression must evaluate to either
  // a string or null value. If the expression evaluates to a string, the
  // audit annotation is included with the string value. If the expression
  // evaluates to null or empty string the audit annotation will be omitted.

	// manner as validation expressions.
	//
	// The exact matching logic is (in order):
	//   1. If ANY matchCondition evaluates to FALSE, the policy is skipped.
	//   2. If ALL matchConditions evaluate to TRUE, the policy is evaluated.
	//   3. If any matchCondition evaluates to an error (but none are FALSE):
	//      - If failurePolicy=Fail, reject the request
	//      - If failurePolicy=Ignore, the policy is skipped
	//

 * <code>Project</code> instances.</li>
 *
 * <li>Finally, evaluate each <code>Project</code> by executing its <code>{@value #DEFAULT_BUILD_FILE}</code> file, if
 * present, against the project. The projects are evaluated in breadth-wise order, such that a project is evaluated

    }

    @Override
    public IsolatedProject getIsolated() {
        return new DefaultIsolatedProject(this, rootProject);
    }

    @Override
    public DefaultProject evaluate() {
        getProjectEvaluator().evaluate(this, state);
        return this;
    }

    @Override
    public ProjectInternal bindAllModelRules() {
        try {
            getModelRegistry().bindAllReferences();

			},
		},
		{
			name: "expression must evaluate to bool",
			input: schema.Structural{
				Generic: schema.Generic{
					Type: "object",
				},
				ValidationExtensions: schema.ValidationExtensions{
					XValidations: apiextensions.ValidationRules{
						{Rule: "42"},
					},
				},
			},
			expectedResults: []validationMatcher{
				invalidError("must evaluate to a bool"),
			},
		},
		{

	}

	// 3. If an inline session-policy is present, evaluate it.
	hasSessionPolicy, isAllowedSP := isAllowedBySessionPolicyForServiceAccount(args)
	if hasSessionPolicy {
		return isAllowedSP && (isOwnerDerived || combinedPolicy.IsAllowed(parentArgs))
	}

	// Sub policy not set. Evaluate only the parent policies.
	return (isOwnerDerived || combinedPolicy.IsAllowed(parentArgs))
}

   F_0 = forward(args_0, N_0)
   T_0 = core_tpu(args_0, N_0, F_0)
   // B_0 = backward() is not evaluated here.
}

args_1 = update_args(args_0, N_0, T_0)

// Start step 1
C_1 = cond(args_1)
N_1 = non_tpu(args_1)
if (C_1) {
   F_1 = forward(args_1, N_1)
   // T_1 = core_tpu() is not evaluated here.
   // B_1 = backward() is not evaluated here.
}

// Partial update of args. We expect this to be sufficient

			// pointer error. https://golang.org/issue/15125
			"MissingFieldOnNil",
			"{{.MissingField}}",
			(*T)(nil),
			"can't evaluate field MissingField in type *template.T",
		},
		{
			"MissingFieldOnNonNil",
			"{{.MissingField}}",
			&T{},
			"can't evaluate field MissingField in type *template.T",
		},
		{
			"ExistingFieldOnNil",
			"{{.X}}",
			(*T)(nil),

// formulas:
//
//     softmax = div(exp(logits), sum(exp(logits)))
//     log_softmax = sub(logits, log(sum(exp(logits))))
//
// TODO(jpienaar): Evaluate benefit of templating here.
template <typename OpTy, bool use_log = true>
class LowerSoftmaxOp : public OpRewritePattern<OpTy> {
 public:
  using OpRewritePattern<OpTy>::OpRewritePattern;