for the availability of IPs sorting the matching IPAddressPools
                  by priority, starting from the highest to the lowest. If multiple
                  IPAddressPools have the same priority, choice will be random.
                properties:
                  namespaceSelectors:
                    description: NamespaceSelectors list of label selectors to select

     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *
     * On the other hand, the current signature is consistent with the similar allAsList method. And
     * eventually this method may go away entirely in favor of an API like

	total := serverPools.TotalAvailable()
	if total == 0 {
		return -1
	}
	// choose when we reach this many
	choose := rand.Uint64() % total
	atTotal := uint64(0)
	for _, pool := range serverPools {
		atTotal += pool.Available
		if atTotal > choose && pool.Available > 0 {
			return pool.Index
		}
	}
	// Should not happen, but print values just in case.

      public void run() {
        thirdSignal.countDown();
        result.set(1, cache.getUnchecked(key));
        doneSignal.countDown();
      }
    }.start();

    // give the second get a chance to run; it is okay for this to be racy
    // as the end result should be the same either way
    thirdSignal.await();
    Thread.yield();

    // Expand!
    CacheTesting.forceExpandSegment(cache, key);

      environ_cp['TF_NEED_CLANG'] = str(choose_compiler(environ_cp))
      if environ_cp.get('TF_NEED_CLANG') == '1':
        clang_compiler_path = set_clang_compiler_path(environ_cp)
        clang_version = retrieve_clang_version(clang_compiler_path)
        disable_clang_offsetof_extension(clang_version)
    if is_windows():
      environ_cp['TF_NEED_CLANG'] = str(choose_compiler_Win(environ_cp))

      public void run() {
        thirdSignal.countDown();
        result.set(1, cache.getUnchecked(key));
        doneSignal.countDown();
      }
    }.start();

    // give the second get a chance to run; it is okay for this to be racy
    // as the end result should be the same either way
    thirdSignal.await();
    Thread.yield();

    // Expand!
    CacheTesting.forceExpandSegment(cache, key);

   * without contention. Because assignment of entries to these partitions is not necessarily
   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead

   * cartesian set is constructed, the input sets are merely copied. Only as the resulting set is
   * iterated are the individual lists created, and these are not retained after iteration.
   *
   * @param sets the sets to choose elements from, in the order that the elements chosen from those
   *     sets should appear in the resulting lists
   * @param <B> any common base class shared by all axes (often just {@link Object})

   * returned to the caller, although this is neither guaranteed to occur nor required to be
   * consistent. For example, this method <i>might</i> choose to pass through recognized
   * implementations of {@code PeekingIterator} when the behavior of the implementation is known to
   * meet the contract guaranteed by this method.
   *

   * returned to the caller, although this is neither guaranteed to occur nor required to be
   * consistent. For example, this method <i>might</i> choose to pass through recognized
   * implementations of {@code PeekingIterator} when the behavior of the implementation is known to
   * meet the contract guaranteed by this method.
   *