//    the initial write (just stronger guarantees if it does).
  //
  // See: http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/2015-January/013800.html
  // For a (long) discussion about this specific issue and the general futility of life.
  //
  // For the time being we are OK with the problem discussed above since it requires a caller to

  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter
  //   is). If we wanted to be strict about it, we could store the unpark() time in the Waiter node
  //   and we could use that to make a decision about whether or not we timed out prior to being
  //   unparked.

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *

   *
   * <p>This test may fail miserably on non-OpenJDK environments...
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  @AndroidIncompatible // relies on assumptions about OpenJDK
  public void testNewHashMapWithExpectedSize_wontGrow() throws Exception {
    // before jdk7u40: creates one-bucket table
    // after  jdk7u40: creates empty table

   *
   * <p>This test may fail miserably on non-OpenJDK environments...
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  @AndroidIncompatible // relies on assumptions about OpenJDK
  public void testNewHashMapWithExpectedSize_wontGrow() throws Exception {
    // before jdk7u40: creates one-bucket table
    // after  jdk7u40: creates empty table

     * implementation type.
     *
     * <p>This method is provided as a convenience for tests. Otherwise they'd need to be
     * knowledgeable about all the implementation details of our type system trickery.
     */
    abstract E castForTesting(InternalEntry<K, V, ?> entry);

    /** Unsafely extracts the key reference queue used by this segment. */

    if (totalCharacters * 2 <= DISTINCT_CHARS) {
      return precomputedPositive(totalCharacters, table, toString());
    } else {
      // TODO(lowasser): is it worth it to worry about the last character of large matchers?
      table.flip(Character.MIN_VALUE, Character.MAX_VALUE + 1);
      int negatedCharacters = DISTINCT_CHARS - totalCharacters;
      String suffix = ".negate()";

    if (totalCharacters * 2 <= DISTINCT_CHARS) {
      return precomputedPositive(totalCharacters, table, toString());
    } else {
      // TODO(lowasser): is it worth it to worry about the last character of large matchers?
      table.flip(Character.MIN_VALUE, Character.MAX_VALUE + 1);
      int negatedCharacters = DISTINCT_CHARS - totalCharacters;
      String suffix = ".negate()";

   * this still yields higher concurrency than full synchronization.
   *
   * <p>Defaults to 4. <b>Note:</b>The default may change in the future. If you care about this
   * value, you should always choose it explicitly.
   *
   * <p>The current implementation uses the concurrency level to create a fixed number of hashtable

      // String is then matched against <? extends CharSequence>, the supertypeArgs[0].
      if (!of(subtypeParam).is(supertypeArgs[i], typeVars[i])) {
        return false;
      }
    }
    // We only care about the case when the supertype is a non-static inner class
    // in which case we need to make sure the subclass's owner type is a subtype of the
    // supertype's owner.