*
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid
   * creating a lot of compile errors that users would not find to be informative, we're giving in

      Table<R, C, V> table(Table<R, C, V> table, @CheckForNull Object mutex) {
    return new SynchronizedTable<>(table, mutex);
  }

  static final class SynchronizedTable<
          R extends @Nullable Object, C extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      extends SynchronizedObject implements Table<R, C, V> {

    SynchronizedTable(Table<R, C, V> delegate, @CheckForNull Object mutex) {

    // In JDK8, table is set lazily, so it may be null.
    return table == null ? 0 : table.length;
  }

  public void testCapacityForLargeSizes() {
    int[] largeExpectedSizes =
        new int[] {
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2 - 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2 + 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE
        };

    // In JDK8, table is set lazily, so it may be null.
    return table == null ? 0 : table.length;
  }

  public void testCapacityForLargeSizes() {
    int[] largeExpectedSizes =
        new int[] {
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2 - 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2 + 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE
        };

          }
        }
      }
      table = newTable;
      this.count = newCount;
    }

    boolean replace(K key, int hash, V oldValue, V newValue) {
      lock();
      try {
        preWriteCleanup();

        AtomicReferenceArray<E> table = this.table;
        int index = hash & (table.length() - 1);
        E first = table.get(index);

  CharMatcher precomputedInternal() {
    final BitSet table = new BitSet();
    setBits(table);
    int totalCharacters = table.cardinality();
    if (totalCharacters * 2 <= DISTINCT_CHARS) {
      return precomputedPositive(totalCharacters, table, toString());
    } else {
      // TODO(lowasser): is it worth it to worry about the last character of large matchers?
      table.flip(Character.MIN_VALUE, Character.MAX_VALUE + 1);

    HashSet<E> set = newHashSet();
    Iterators.addAll(set, elements);
    return set;
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new hash set using the smallest initial table size that can hold {@code expectedSize}
   * elements without resizing. Note that this is not what {@link HashSet#HashSet(int)} does, but it
   * is what most users want and expect it to do.
   *

  CharMatcher precomputedInternal() {
    final BitSet table = new BitSet();
    setBits(table);
    int totalCharacters = table.cardinality();
    if (totalCharacters * 2 <= DISTINCT_CHARS) {
      return precomputedPositive(totalCharacters, table, toString());
    } else {
      // TODO(lowasser): is it worth it to worry about the last character of large matchers?
      table.flip(Character.MIN_VALUE, Character.MAX_VALUE + 1);

   * table is internally partitioned to try to permit the indicated number of concurrent updates
   * without contention. Because assignment of entries to these partitions is not necessarily
   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly

   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid
   * creating a lot of compile errors that users would not find to be informative, we're giving in