}
              });
      thread.start();
      // we want to wait until each thread is WAITING - one thread waiting inside CacheLoader.load
      // (in startSignal.await()), and the others waiting for that thread's result.
      while (thread.isAlive() && thread.getState() != Thread.State.WAITING) {
        Thread.yield();
      }
    }
    gettersStartedSignal.countDown();

                }
              });
      thread.start();
      // we want to wait until each thread is WAITING - one thread waiting inside CacheLoader.load
      // (in startSignal.await()), and the others waiting for that thread's result.
      while (thread.isAlive() && thread.getState() != Thread.State.WAITING) {
        Thread.yield();
      }
    }
    gettersStartedSignal.countDown();

      // unpark even though the thread has already removed itself from the list. But even if we did
      // use a CAS, that race would still exist (it would just be ever so slightly smaller).
      Thread w = thread;
      if (w != null) {
        thread = null;
        LockSupport.unpark(w);
      }
    }
  }

  /**

   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not
   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the cache

     * cleaning up from the read thread.
     */
    void postReadCleanup() {
      if ((readCount.incrementAndGet() & DRAIN_THRESHOLD) == 0) {
        runCleanup();
      }
    }

    /**
     * Performs routine cleanup prior to executing a write. This should be called every time a write

                         * sent. Unfortunately calling disconnect() doesn't always
                         * actually shutdown the connection before other threads
                         * have committed themselves (e.g. InterruptTest example).
                         */
                        try {
                            trans.disconnect(true);

  }

  /**
   * Creates a thread-safe set backed by a hash map. The set is backed by a {@link
   * ConcurrentHashMap} instance, and thus carries the same concurrency guarantees.
   *
   * <p>Unlike {@code HashSet}, this class does NOT allow {@code null} to be used as an element. The
   * set is serializable.
   *
   * @return a new, empty thread-safe {@code Set}
   * @since 15.0
   */

    }

    default void setCrawlingThreadCount(final int value) {
        setSystemPropertyAsInt(Constants.CRAWLING_THREAD_COUNT_PROPERTY, value);
    }

    default int getCrawlingThreadCount() {
        return getSystemPropertyAsInt(Constants.CRAWLING_THREAD_COUNT_PROPERTY, 5);
    }

    default void setSearchLog(final boolean value) {

            //
            // We need an executor that will not block.
            // We can't use work stealing, as we are building a graph
            // and this could lead to cycles where a thread waits for
            // a task to finish, then execute another one which waits
            // for the initial task...
            // In order to work around that problem, we override the

   *
   * <p>The provided iterator must support {@link Iterator#remove()} or else the returned iterator
   * will fail on the first call to {@code next}. The returned {@link Iterator} is also not
   * thread-safe.
   *
   * @param iterator the iterator to remove and return elements from
   * @return an iterator that removes and returns elements from the supplied iterator
   * @since 2.0
   */