}
        }
      }
      table = newTable;
      this.count = newCount;
    }

    boolean replace(K key, int hash, V oldValue, V newValue) {
      lock();
      try {
        preWriteCleanup();

        AtomicReferenceArray<E> table = this.table;
        int index = hash & (table.length() - 1);
        E first = table.get(index);

  CharMatcher precomputedInternal() {
    final BitSet table = new BitSet();
    setBits(table);
    int totalCharacters = table.cardinality();
    if (totalCharacters * 2 <= DISTINCT_CHARS) {
      return precomputedPositive(totalCharacters, table, toString());
    } else {
      // TODO(lowasser): is it worth it to worry about the last character of large matchers?
      table.flip(Character.MIN_VALUE, Character.MAX_VALUE + 1);

    HashSet<E> set = newHashSet();
    Iterators.addAll(set, elements);
    return set;
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new hash set using the smallest initial table size that can hold {@code expectedSize}
   * elements without resizing. Note that this is not what {@link HashSet#HashSet(int)} does, but it
   * is what most users want and expect it to do.
   *

 * There is still the issue of having to run the lifecycle in order to find all the compile source roots and resource
 * directories but I hope to take care of this during the Maven 4.0 release (jvz).
 * </p>
 */
public class MavenProject implements Cloneable {

    private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MavenProject.class);

import org.codelibs.core.net.URLUtil;
import org.codelibs.core.nio.ChannelUtil;

/**
 * コピーのためのユーティリティです。
 * <p>
 * コピー可能な入力と出力の組み合わせと、コピーされる要素の単位は以下のとおりです。
 * </p>
 * <table border="1">
 * <caption>Elements for coping instances</caption>
 * <tr>
 * <th rowspan="2">入力の型</th>
 * <th colspan="4">出力の型</th>
 * </tr>
 * <tr>
 * <th>{@link OutputStream}</th>
 * <th>{@link Writer}</th>

   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid
   * creating a lot of compile errors that users would not find to be informative, we're giving in

      Table<R, C, V> table(Table<R, C, V> table, @CheckForNull Object mutex) {
    return new SynchronizedTable<>(table, mutex);
  }

  static final class SynchronizedTable<
          R extends @Nullable Object, C extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      extends SynchronizedObject implements Table<R, C, V> {

    SynchronizedTable(Table<R, C, V> delegate, @CheckForNull Object mutex) {

    // In JDK8, table is set lazily, so it may be null.
    return table == null ? 0 : table.length;
  }

  public void testCapacityForLargeSizes() {
    int[] largeExpectedSizes =
        new int[] {
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2 - 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2 + 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE
        };

    // In JDK8, table is set lazily, so it may be null.
    return table == null ? 0 : table.length;
  }

  public void testCapacityForLargeSizes() {
    int[] largeExpectedSizes =
        new int[] {
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2 - 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2 + 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1,
          Integer.MAX_VALUE
        };

nx??g&10aq0-ineve--nx?av?ev?lot?r&ajn&evvad?u??ájn&evvad?u????h?iz-lf--nx?j&ddadab?sel??k&el?hoj&sarak?šárák??iiv&ag&na&el?g??ŋ&ael?ág???ran???l&f?lahrevo?o&ms?s??sennev?t-&ilm--nx?tom--nx??u&-edr--nx?s??øms??muar?n&0-tsr--nx?2-dob--nx?5-&asir--nx?tals--nx??a&r!-i-om?f?t??t??douvsatvid?kiv?m&os?øs??n&od?ød??ra?sen?t&aouvatheig?ouv&a&c&ch&ab?áb??h&ab?áb???n??i&ag?ág??sa&mo?ttvid??án???z-rey--nx?ær&f?t???o&p-&ladr--nx?sens--nx??q-nagv--nx?r-asns--nx?s-kjks--nx?v-murb--nx?w-&anr&f--nx?t--nx??ublk--...