throw new IllegalArgumentException(lenientFormat(errorMessageTemplate, p1, p2, p3, p4));
    }
  }

  /**
   * Ensures the truth of an expression involving the state of the calling instance, but not
   * involving any parameters to the calling method.
   *
   * @param expression a boolean expression
   * @throws IllegalStateException if {@code expression} is false
   * @see Verify#verify Verify.verify()
   */

      throw new IllegalArgumentException(lenientFormat(errorMessageTemplate, p1, p2, p3, p4));
    }
  }

  /**
   * Ensures the truth of an expression involving the state of the calling instance, but not
   * involving any parameters to the calling method.
   *
   * @param expression a boolean expression
   * @throws IllegalStateException if {@code expression} is false
   * @see Verify#verify Verify.verify()
   */

     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *

     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?
     *

    node.thread = null; // mark as 'deleted'
    restart:
    while (true) {
      Waiter pred = null;
      Waiter curr = waiters;
      if (curr == Waiter.TOMBSTONE) {
        return; // give up if someone is calling complete
      }
      Waiter succ;
      while (curr != null) {
        succ = curr.next;
        if (curr.thread != null) { // we aren't unlinking this node, update pred.
          pred = curr;

    node.thread = null; // mark as 'deleted'
    restart:
    while (true) {
      Waiter pred = null;
      Waiter curr = waiters;
      if (curr == Waiter.TOMBSTONE) {
        return; // give up if someone is calling complete
      }
      Waiter succ;
      while (curr != null) {
        succ = curr.next;
        if (curr.thread != null) { // we aren't unlinking this node, update pred.
          pred = curr;

   * Returns the index of the first matching BMP character in a character sequence, or {@code -1} if
   * no matching character is present.
   *
   * <p>The default implementation iterates over the sequence in forward order calling {@link
   * #matches} for each character.
   *
   * @param sequence the character sequence to examine from the beginning
   * @return an index, or {@code -1} if no character matches
   */

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public E floor(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.floor(e);
    }

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public E ceiling(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.ceiling(e);
    }

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public E higher(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.higher(e);
    }

    @Override

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public E floor(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.floor(e);
    }

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public E ceiling(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.ceiling(e);
    }

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public E higher(@ParametricNullness E e) {
      return delegate.higher(e);
    }

    @Override

   * Returns the index of the first matching BMP character in a character sequence, or {@code -1} if
   * no matching character is present.
   *
   * <p>The default implementation iterates over the sequence in forward order calling {@link
   * #matches} for each character.
   *
   * @param sequence the character sequence to examine from the beginning
   * @return an index, or {@code -1} if no character matches
   */