* IllegalArgumentException} if passed a {@code fromKey} less than an earlier {@code fromKey}.
   * However, this method doesn't throw an exception in that situation, but instead keeps the
   * original {@code fromKey}. Similarly, this method keeps the original {@code toKey}, instead of
   * throwing an exception, if passed a {@code toKey} greater than an earlier {@code toKey}.
   */
  @Override

   * IllegalArgumentException} if passed a {@code fromKey} less than an earlier {@code fromKey}.
   * However, this method doesn't throw an exception in that situation, but instead keeps the
   * original {@code fromKey}. Similarly, this method keeps the original {@code toKey}, instead of
   * throwing an exception, if passed a {@code toKey} greater than an earlier {@code toKey}.
   */
  @Override

      }

      message += "delay)";
    }
    // It's confusing to see a completed future in a timeout message; if isDone() returns false,
    // then we know it must have given a pending toString value earlier. If not, then the future
    // completed after the timeout expired, and the message might be success.
    if (isDone()) {
      throw new TimeoutException(message + " but future completed as timeout expired");
    }

        // We only check for groupId/artifactId/version/classifier cause if there is another
        // module with the same groupId/artifactId/version/classifier this will fail the build
        // earlier like "Project '...' is duplicated in the reactor.
        // So it is sufficient to check only groupId/artifactId/version/classifier and not the
        // packaging type.
        for (Dependency dependency : dependencies) {

  //    (hypothetical) unsafe read by our caller. Note: adding 'volatile' does not fix this issue,
  //    it would just add an edge such that if done() observed non-null, then it would also
  //    definitely observe all earlier writes, but we still have no guarantee that done() would see
  //    the initial write (just stronger guarantees if it does).
  //
  // See: http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/2015-January/013800.html