MapDifference<Integer, String> original = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> same = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> reverse = Maps.difference(right, left);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> diff2 = Maps.difference(left, right2);

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(original, same)

    MapDifference<Integer, String> original = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> same = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> reverse = Maps.difference(right, left);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> diff2 = Maps.difference(left, right2);

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(original, same)

                    set1.add(samples().e3());
                    Set<String> set2 = Sets.newHashSet(samples().e3());
                    return Sets.difference(set1, set2);
                  }
                })
            .named("Sets.difference")
            .withFeatures(CollectionSize.ANY, CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)
            .createTestSuite());

    suite.addTest(

        return set1.containsAll(collection) && set2.containsAll(collection);
      }
    };
  }

  /**
   * Returns an unmodifiable <b>view</b> of the difference of two sets. The returned set contains
   * all elements that are contained by {@code set1} and not contained by {@code set2}. {@code set2}

   *
   * <p>As we iterate from {@code 0} to {@code nThreads}, threads with an even index will call
   * {@code getUnchecked}, and threads with an odd index will call {@code get}. If the cache throws
   * exceptions, this difference may be visible in the returned List.
   */
  private static <K> List<Object> doConcurrentGet(
      final LoadingCache<K, ?> cache,
      final K key,
      int nThreads,

   *
   * <p>As we iterate from {@code 0} to {@code nThreads}, threads with an even index will call
   * {@code getUnchecked}, and threads with an odd index will call {@code get}. If the cache throws
   * exceptions, this difference may be visible in the returned List.
   */
  private static <K> List<Object> doConcurrentGet(
      final LoadingCache<K, ?> cache,
      final K key,
      int nThreads,

     * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept
     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
     * difference is that calling it with <Foo> won't work when an input Future has a @Nullable
     * type. So why even make that error possible by giving callers the choice?