\.?|oct\.?|nov\.?|dic\.?)/i;function sn(e,a,t,s){var n={s:["m\xf5ne sekundi","m\xf5ni sekund","paar sekundit"],ss:[e+"sekundi",e+"sekundit"],m:["\xfche minuti","\xfcks minut"],mm:[e+" minuti",e+" minutit"],h:["\xfche tunni","tund aega","\xfcks tund"],hh:[e+" tunni",e+" tundi"],d:["\xfche p\xe4eva","\xfcks p\xe4ev"],M:["kuu aja","kuu aega","\xfcks kuu"],MM:[e+" kuu",e+" kuud"],y:["\xfche aasta","aasta","\xfcks aasta"],yy:[e+" aasta",e+" aastat"]};return a?n[t][2]?n[t][2]:n[t][1]:s?n[t][0]:n[t][1]...

* ✏ Rewording in `docs/en/docs/tutorial/debugging.md`. PR [#9581](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/9581) by [@ivan-abc](https://github.com/ivan-abc).
* 📝 Add german blog post (Domain-driven Design mit Python und FastAPI). PR [#9261](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/9261) by [@msander](https://github.com/msander).

and may explain why type inference fails in unusual code situations.
But by and large these rules can be ignored when writing Go code:
type inference is designed to mostly "work as expected",
and the unification rules are fine-tuned accordingly.
</p>

<p>
Type unification is controlled by a <i>matching mode</i>, which may
be <i>exact</i> or <i>loose</i>.
As unification recursively descends a composite type structure,