eat your data, it may nibble at it a bit. (It passes e2e testing but has
  not yet seen real-world use.)
  
  At this point it should be functionally mostly identical to the iptables
  mode, except that it does not (and will not) support Service NodePorts on
  127.0.0.1. (Also note that there are currently no command-line arguments

    <magic priority="50">
      <!-- MM.* = Big endian (M=Motorola) and 0x002a in big endian    -->
      <match value="MM\x00\x2a" type="string" offset="0"/>
      <!-- II*. = Little endian (I=Intel) and 0x002a in little endian -->
      <match value="II\x2a\x00" type="string" offset="0"/>
      <!-- MM.+ = Big endian (M=Motorola) and 0x002a in big endian-->
      <match value="MM\x00\x2b" type="string" offset="0"/>

ikoma.nara.jp
kamikitayama.nara.jp
kanmaki.nara.jp
kashiba.nara.jp
kashihara.nara.jp
katsuragi.nara.jp
kawai.nara.jp
kawakami.nara.jp
kawanishi.nara.jp
koryo.nara.jp
kurotaki.nara.jp
mitsue.nara.jp
miyake.nara.jp
nara.nara.jp
nosegawa.nara.jp
oji.nara.jp
ouda.nara.jp
oyodo.nara.jp
sakurai.nara.jp
sango.nara.jp
shimoichi.nara.jp
shimokitayama.nara.jp
shinjo.nara.jp

- Fix the bug where image garbage collection is disabled by mistake. ([#66051](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66051), [@jiaxuanzhou](https://github.com/jiaxuanzhou))

- Fixed node lifecycle controller panic when conditionType ready is been patch `nil` by mistake. ([#122874](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/122874), [@fusida](https://github.com/fusida))

* Update to use go1.10.3 ([#65726](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65726), [@ixdy](https://github.com/ixdy))
* Fix the bug where image garbage collection is disabled by mistake. ([#66051](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66051), [@jiaxuanzhou](https://github.com/jiaxuanzhou))

* The namespace API object no longer supports the deletecollection operation, which was previously allowed by mistake and did not respect expected namespace lifecycle semantics. ([#47098](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/47098), [@liggitt](https://github.com/liggitt))

a compiler reports a type inference or other error),
and may explain why type inference fails in unusual code situations.
But by and large these rules can be ignored when writing Go code:
type inference is designed to mostly "work as expected",
and the unification rules are fine-tuned accordingly.
</p>

<p>
Type unification is controlled by a <i>matching mode</i>, which may
be <i>exact</i> or <i>loose</i>.

resources of running and terminating pods when deciding to accept new pods, since terminating pods are still holding on to those resources. This stricter handling may surface to end users as pod rejections when creating pods that are scheduled to mostly full nodes that have other terminating pods holding the resources the new pods need. The most likely error would be a pod set to `Failed` phase with reason set to `OutOfCpu` or `OutOfMemory`, but any resource on the node that has some fixed limit...