if s.canSSA(n.X) {
					if base.Debug.Append > 0 { // replicating old diagnostic message
						base.WarnfAt(n.Pos(), "append: len-only update (in local slice)")
					}
					break
				}
				if base.Debug.Append > 0 {
					base.WarnfAt(n.Pos(), "append: len-only update")
				}
				s.append(rhs, true)
				return
			}
		}

		if ir.IsBlank(n.X) {

}

func (f *http2Framer) writeByte(v byte) { f.wbuf = append(f.wbuf, v) }

func (f *http2Framer) writeBytes(v []byte) { f.wbuf = append(f.wbuf, v...) }

func (f *http2Framer) writeUint16(v uint16) { f.wbuf = append(f.wbuf, byte(v>>8), byte(v)) }

func (f *http2Framer) writeUint32(v uint32) {
	f.wbuf = append(f.wbuf, byte(v>>24), byte(v>>16), byte(v>>8), byte(v))
}

const (

  Before this PR, if PreFilter return `Unschedulable`, it may result in an unexpected abortion in the preemption, 
  which shouldn't happen in the default scheduler, but may happen in schedulers with a custom plugin. ([#119779](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/119779), [@sanposhiho](https://github.com/sanposhiho)) [SIG Scheduling]

		if len(vol.Name) == 0 {
			el = append(el, field.Required(namePath, ""))
		} else {
			el = append(el, ValidateDNS1123Label(vol.Name, namePath)...)
		}
		if allNames.Has(vol.Name) {
			el = append(el, field.Duplicate(namePath, vol.Name))
		}
		if len(el) == 0 {
			allNames.Insert(vol.Name)
			vols[vol.Name] = vol.VolumeSource
		} else {
			allErrs = append(allErrs, el...)
		}

- Fixed data race in `kube-scheduler` when preemption races with a Pod update. ([#116395](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/116395), [@alculquicondor](https://github.com/alculquicondor)) [SIG Scheduling]

Error("Attempted to sort a screen with multiple values. This should never happen. Please open a bug report.");if(a.reason==="raw-values"||s.reason==="raw-values")throw new Error("Attempted to sort a screen with raw values. This should never happen. Please open a bug report.");if(a.reason==="min-and-max"||s.reason==="min-and-max")throw new Error("Attempted to sort a screen with both min and max values. This should never happen. Please open a bug report.");let{min:o,max:u}=r.values[0],{min:c,max:f}=...

s3 := append(s2, s0...)            // append a slice              s3 is []int{0, 0, 2, 3, 5, 7, 0, 0}
s4 := append(s3[3:6], s3[2:]...)   // append overlapping slice    s4 is []int{3, 5, 7, 2, 3, 5, 7, 0, 0}

var t []interface{}
t = append(t, 42, 3.1415, "foo")   //                             t is []interface{}{42, 3.1415, "foo"}

var b []byte

			continue
		}
		// record the matched rule for debugging purposes
		tracer.matches = append(tracer.matches, rule.Raw)

		switch rule.Jump.Value {
		case "KUBE-MARK-MASQ":
			tracer.markMasq = true
			continue

		case "ACCEPT", "REJECT", "DROP":
			// (only valid in filter)
			tracer.outputs = append(tracer.outputs, rule.Jump.Value)
			return true

		case "DNAT":
			// (only valid in nat)

- Overall, enable the feature of `PreferNominatedNode` will  improve the performance of scheduling where preemption might frequently happen, but in theory, enable the feature of `PreferNominatedNode`, the pod might not be scheduled to the best candidate node in the cluster. ([#93179](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/93179), [@chendave](https://github.com/chendave)) [SIG Scheduling...

      // create the expected update shape which scalar update is broadcasted to
      expected_update_shape.append(indices_shape.begin(),
                                   std::prev(indices_shape.end()));

      expected_update_shape.append(std::next(tensor_shape.begin(), index_depth),
                                   tensor_shape.end());