- [`KT-37316`](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-37316) Allow actual classifier to have more permissive visibility than visibility of expect classifier
- [`KT-58616`](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-58616) KMP: consider relaxing the classifier visibility matching rules

                                  description: "Type identifies the type of filter
                                    to apply. As with other API fields, types are
                                    classified into three conformance levels: \n -
                                    Core: Filter types and their corresponding configuration
                                    defined by \"Support: Core\" in this package,

* 🌐 Add Russian translation for `docs/ru/docs/history-design-future.md`. PR [#5986](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/5986) by [@Xewus](https://github.com/Xewus).

### Internal

* ➕ Add `pydantic` to PyPI classifiers. PR [#5914](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/5914) by [@yezz123](https://github.com/yezz123).

		x := s.expr(n.X)
		if to == from {
			return x
		}

		// Special case for not confusing GC and liveness.
		// We don't want pointers accidentally classified
		// as not-pointers or vice-versa because of copy
		// elision.
		if to.IsPtrShaped() != from.IsPtrShaped() {
			return s.newValue2(ssa.OpConvert, to, x, s.mem())
		}