public void setAvailable_PercentileRanks(double[] values) {
        setAvailable_PercentileRanks(values, null);
    }

    public void setAvailable_PercentileRanks(double[] values, ConditionOptionCall<PercentileRanksAggregationBuilder> opLambda) {
        setAvailable_PercentileRanks("available", values, opLambda);
    }

    public void setAvailable_PercentileRanks(String name, double[] values,

    public void setAvailable_PercentileRanks(double[] values) {
        setAvailable_PercentileRanks(values, null);
    }

    public void setAvailable_PercentileRanks(double[] values, ConditionOptionCall<PercentileRanksAggregationBuilder> opLambda) {
        setAvailable_PercentileRanks("available", values, opLambda);
    }

    public void setAvailable_PercentileRanks(String name, double[] values,

          values.iterator(),
          keyFunction,
          ImmutableMap.builderWithExpectedSize(((Collection<?>) values).size()));
    }
    return uniqueIndex(values.iterator(), keyFunction);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a map with the given {@code values}, indexed by keys derived from those values. In
   * other words, each input value produces an entry in the map whose key is the result of applying

          values.iterator(),
          keyFunction,
          ImmutableMap.builderWithExpectedSize(((Collection<?>) values).size()));
    }
    return uniqueIndex(values.iterator(), keyFunction);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a map with the given {@code values}, indexed by keys derived from those values. In
   * other words, each input value produces an entry in the map whose key is the result of applying

          DeferredCloser closer,
          @ParametricNullness V1 value1,
          @ParametricNullness V2 value2,
          @ParametricNullness V3 value3,
          @ParametricNullness V4 value4,
          @ParametricNullness V5 value5)
          throws Exception;
    }

    /**
     * A function that returns a {@link ClosingFuture} when applied to the values of the five

                have their default values. This is different from
                `response_model_exclude_defaults` in that if the fields are set,
                they will be included in the response, even if the value is the same
                as the default.

                When `True`, default values are omitted from the response.

                Read more about it in the

    public void setHitCount_PercentileRanks(double[] values) {
        setHitCount_PercentileRanks(values, null);
    }

    public void setHitCount_PercentileRanks(double[] values, ConditionOptionCall<PercentileRanksAggregationBuilder> opLambda) {
        setHitCount_PercentileRanks("hitCount", values, opLambda);
    }

			),
			metricType,
			metric.Value,
			values...)
		return true
	})
}

func getOrderedLabelValueArrays(labelsWithValue map[string]string) (labels, values []string) {
	labels = make([]string, 0, len(labelsWithValue))
	values = make([]string, 0, len(labelsWithValue))
	for l, v := range labelsWithValue {
		labels = append(labels, l)
		values = append(values, v)
	}
	return
}

causes a <a href="#Run_time_panics">run-time panic</a> if values
of that type are not comparable.  This behavior applies not only to direct interface
value comparisons but also when comparing arrays of interface values
or structs with interface-valued fields.
</p>

<p>
Slice, map, and function values are not comparable.
However, as a special case, a slice, map, or function value may

                have their default values. This is different from
                `response_model_exclude_defaults` in that if the fields are set,
                they will be included in the response, even if the value is the same
                as the default.

                When `True`, default values are omitted from the response.

                Read more about it in the