"swedish_keywords",
            "swedish_override",
            "swedish_stemmer"
          ]
        },
        "thai_analyzer": {
          "type": "custom",
          "tokenizer": "thai",
          "filter": [
            "truncate20_filter",
            "lowercase",
            "thai_stop"
          ]
        },
        "turkish_analyzer": {
          "type": "custom",

            "swedish_keywords",
            "swedish_override",
            "swedish_stemmer"
          ]
        },
        "thai_analyzer": {
          "type": "custom",
          "tokenizer": "thai",
          "filter": [
            "truncate20_filter",
            "lowercase",
            "thai_stop"
          ]
        },
        "turkish_analyzer": {
          "type": "custom",

// xn--clchc0ea0b2g2a9gcd ("Singapore", Tamil) : SG
சிங்கப்பூர்

// xn--ogbpf8fl ("Syria", Arabic) : SY
سورية

// xn--mgbtf8fl ("Syria", Arabic, variant) : SY
سوريا

// xn--o3cw4h ("Thai", Thai) : TH
// http://www.thnic.co.th
ไทย
ศึกษา.ไทย
ธุรกิจ.ไทย
รัฐบาล.ไทย
ทหาร.ไทย
เน็ต.ไทย
องค์กร.ไทย

// xn--pgbs0dh ("Tunisia", Arabic) : TN
// http://nic.tn
تونس

   *     begins. Consider replacing code that creates {@link ListenableFuture}s of closeable types,
   *     including those that pass them to this method, with {@link #submit(ClosingCallable,
   *     Executor)} in order to ensure that resources do not leak. Or, to start a pipeline with a
   *     {@link ListenableFuture} that doesn't create values that should be closed, use {@link
   *     ClosingFuture#from}.
   */

  The executioner's argument was, that you couldn't cut off a
head unless there was a body to cut it off from:  that he had
never had to do such a thing before, and he wasn't going to begin
at HIS time of life.

  The King's argument was, that anything that had a head could be
beheaded, and that you weren't to talk nonsense.

  The Queen's argument was, that if something wasn't done about

      // https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3e393047e12147a81e2899784b943923fc34da8e, a bug
      // meant that sometimes a too-large threshold is calculated. However, this new threshold is
      // independent of the initial capacity, except that it won't be lower than the threshold
      // computed from that capacity. Because the internal table is only allocated on the first

      // https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3e393047e12147a81e2899784b943923fc34da8e, a bug
      // meant that sometimes a too-large threshold is calculated. However, this new threshold is
      // independent of the initial capacity, except that it won't be lower than the threshold
      // computed from that capacity. Because the internal table is only allocated on the first

                    corresponding JSON.
                * Filtering: the JSON sent to the client will only contain the data
                    (fields) defined in the `response_model`. If you returned an object
                    that contains an attribute `password` but the `response_model` does
                    not include that field, the JSON sent to the client would not have

                    corresponding JSON.
                * Filtering: the JSON sent to the client will only contain the data
                    (fields) defined in the `response_model`. If you returned an object
                    that contains an attribute `password` but the `response_model` does
                    not include that field, the JSON sent to the client would not have

- Fixed an issue in the kubelet that showed when writeable layers and read-only layers were at different paths within the same mount.
  Kubernetes was previously detecting that the image filesystem was split, even when that was not really the case. ([#126562](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126562), [@kannon92](https://github.com/kannon92)) [SIG Node]