*/
    CLOSING,

    /** The {@link CloseableList} has been closed. It may not be further subsumed. */
    CLOSED,

    /**
     * {@link ClosingFuture#finishToValueAndCloser(ValueAndCloserConsumer, Executor)} has been
     * called. The step may not be further subsumed, nor may {@link #finishToFuture()} be called.
     */
    WILL_CREATE_VALUE_AND_CLOSER,
  }

<code>a</code> through <code>b</code> as alternatives. The horizontal
ellipsis <code>…</code> is also used elsewhere in the spec to informally denote various
enumerations or code snippets that are not further specified. The character <code>…</code>
(as opposed to the three characters <code>...</code>) is not a token of the Go
language.
</p>

<h2 id="Source_code_representation">Source code representation</h2>

<p>

  `Repeat, "YOU ARE OLD, FATHER WILLIAM,"' said the Caterpillar.

  Alice folded her hands, and began:--

    `You are old, Father William,' the young man said,
      `And your hair has become very white;
    And yet you incessantly stand on your head--
      Do you think, at your age, it is right?'

    `In my youth,' Father William replied to his son,

new offsets and applying\n * the new style.<br />\n * Prefer `scheduleUpdate` over `update` because of performance reasons.\n * @method\n * @memberof Popper\n */\nexport default function update() {\n  // if popper is destroyed, don't perform any further update\n  if (this.state.isDestroyed) {\n    return;\n  }\n\n  let data = {\n    instance: this,\n    styles: {},\n    arrowStyles: {},\n    attributes: {},\n    flipped: false,\n    offsets: {},\n  };\n\n  // compute reference element offsets\n ...

         * guarantee behavior in that case, anyway, and the current behavior is likely undesirable.
         * So that's either a reason to feel free to change it or a reason to not bother thinking
         * further about this.
         */
        V rightValue = uncheckedCastNullableTToT(onlyOnRight.remove(leftKey));
        if (valueEquivalence.equivalent(leftValue, rightValue)) {
          onBoth.put(leftKey, leftValue);

         * guarantee behavior in that case, anyway, and the current behavior is likely undesirable.
         * So that's either a reason to feel free to change it or a reason to not bother thinking
         * further about this.
         */
        V rightValue = uncheckedCastNullableTToT(onlyOnRight.remove(leftKey));
        if (valueEquivalence.equivalent(leftValue, rightValue)) {
          onBoth.put(leftKey, leftValue);

- **Auth**
  - [alpha] Further polishing of the Role-based access control alpha API including a default set of cluster roles. ([docs](http://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/)) ([kubernetes/features#2](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/2))