},
		{
			name:                    "runtime cost preserved if messageExpression fails during evaluation",
			message:                 "message not messageExpression",
			messageExpression:       `"str1 " + ["a", "b", "c", "d"][4]`,
			costBudget:              50,
			expectedLogErr:          "messageExpression evaluation failed due to: index out of bounds: 4",
			expectedValidationErr:   "message not messageExpression",

However, the order of those events compared to the evaluation
and indexing of <code>x</code> and the evaluation
of <code>y</code> is not specified.
</p>

<pre>
a := 1
f := func() int { a++; return a }
x := []int{a, f()}            // x may be [1, 2] or [2, 2]: evaluation order between a and f() is not specified
m := map[int]int{a: 1, a: 2}  // m may be {2: 1} or {2: 2}: evaluation order between the two map assignments is not specified

				"baz": "qux"
			}`, valid.Unix()),
			want: &user.DefaultInfo{
				Name: "jane",
			},
		},
		// test to ensure omitempty fields not included in user info
		// are set and accessible for CEL evaluation.
		{
			name: "test user validation rule doesn't fail when user info is empty except username",
			options: Options{
				JWTAuthenticator: apiserver.JWTAuthenticator{
					Issuer: apiserver.Issuer{

   * like {@link Map#containsValue} and {@code Map.toString()}. For this to perform well, {@code
   * function} should be fast. To avoid lazy evaluation when the returned map doesn't need to be a
   * view, copy the returned map into a new map of your choosing.
   */
  public static <

   * like {@link Map#containsValue} and {@code Map.toString()}. For this to perform well, {@code
   * function} should be fast. To avoid lazy evaluation when the returned map doesn't need to be a
   * view, copy the returned map into a new map of your choosing.
   */
  public static <

// LogisticOp
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

int64_t LogisticOp::GetArithmeticCount(Operation* op) {
  int64_t count;
  // As a very rough ballpark, the cost of evaluating a math function
  // such as tanh or logistic is about 32 multiplications, and about as
  // many additions/subtractions. (Just a power-of-two order-of-magnitude

  let summary = "Updates inputs to TPU embedding enqueue ops depending on whether graph is in training mode or in evaluation mode.";

  let description = [{
    Updates inputs to TPU embedding enqueue ops depending on whether graph
    is in training mode or in evaluation mode.
  }];

  let constructor = "TFTPU::CreateTPUUpdateEmbeddingEnqueueOpInputsPass()";
}

  int dim_size = rt.getDimSize(0);

  // Worklist to direct partial evaluation.
  SmallVector<ValuePort, 4> worklist;

  // Simple evaluator that attempts to partially evaluate the input value even
  // if unable to evaluate the complete output. Below follows a simple stack
  // based evaluation where it queries what operands/part of operands need to

	ptr := add(v.ptr, field.Offset, "same as non-reflect &v.field")
	return Value{typ, ptr, fl}
}

// FieldByIndex returns the nested field corresponding to index.
// It panics if evaluation requires stepping through a nil
// pointer or a field that is not a struct.
func (v Value) FieldByIndex(index []int) Value {
	if len(index) == 1 {
		return v.Field(index[0])
	}
	v.mustBe(Struct)

                }
            }
"""
        then:
        fails "help"

        and:
        failure.assertHasDescription("A problem occurred evaluating root project 'root'.")
        failure.assertHasCause("Bad registration")
    }

    def "provides useful error message when parameter value cannot be isolated for #type transform"() {