storage for a named variable.

Calling the built-in function <a href="#Allocation"><code>new</code></a>
or taking the address of a <a href="#Composite_literals">composite literal</a>
allocates storage for a variable at run time.
Such an anonymous variable is referred to via a (possibly implicit)
<a href="#Address_operators">pointer indirection</a>.
</p>

<p>

- DRA: the resource claim controller now maintains metrics about the total number of ResourceClaims and the number of allocated ResourceClaims. ([#127661](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/127661), [@pohly](https://github.com/pohly)) [SIG Apps, Instrumentation and Node]

      // independent of the initial capacity, except that it won't be lower than the threshold
      // computed from that capacity. Because the internal table is only allocated on the first
      // write, we won't see copying because of the new threshold. So it is always OK to use the
      // calculation here.
      return (int) ceil(expectedSize / 0.75);
    }

## Changelog since v1.5.3

### Other notable changes

* Fix AWS device allocator to only use valid device names ([#41455](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41455), [@gnufied](https://github.com/gnufied))

  for (int i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
    values[i] = TF_NewBuffer();
    status->status = MessageToBuffer(attr->list().shape(i), values[i]);
    if (!status->status.ok()) {
      // Delete everything allocated to far, the operation has failed.
      for (int j = 0; j <= i; ++j) {
        TF_DeleteBuffer(values[j]);
      }
      return;
    }
  }
}

	}

	resyncStatus := ResyncFailed
	defer func() {
		s.markStatus(resyncStatus, opts, objectAPI)
		globalSiteResyncMetrics.incBucket(opts, resyncStatus)
		s.workerCh <- struct{}{}
	}()
	// Allocate new results channel to receive ObjectInfo.
	objInfoCh := make(chan itemOrErr[ObjectInfo])
	cfg, err := getReplicationConfig(ctx, opts.bucket)
	if err != nil {

      // independent of the initial capacity, except that it won't be lower than the threshold
      // computed from that capacity. Because the internal table is only allocated on the first
      // write, we won't see copying because of the new threshold. So it is always OK to use the
      // calculation here.
      return (int) ceil(expectedSize / 0.75);
    }

* Backporting TPR fix to 1.4 ([#42380](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/42380), [@foxish](https://github.com/foxish))
* Fix AWS device allocator to only use valid device names ([#41455](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41455), [@gnufied](https://github.com/gnufied))