====================================================\n */\n\n$.fn[NAME] = Treeview._jQueryInterface\n$.fn[NAME].Constructor = Treeview\n$.fn[NAME].noConflict = function () {\n  $.fn[NAME] = JQUERY_NO_CONFLICT\n  return Treeview._jQueryInterface\n}\n\nexport default Treeview\n"]}...

pramerica
prato.it
praxi
prd.fr
prd.km
prd.mg
prequalifyme.today
prerelease.replit.dev
press
press.aero
press.cy
press.ma
press.se
presse.km
presse.ml
preview.csb.app
pri.ee
prime
primetel.cloud
principe.st
priv.at
priv.hu
priv.instances.scw.cloud
priv.me
priv.no
priv.pl
privatizehealthinsurance.net
pro
pro.az
pro.br

**How can I mitigate this prior to installing 1.5.5?**

1. Export existing PodSecurityPolicy objects:
  * `kubectl get podsecuritypolicies -o yaml > psp.yaml`
2. Review and delete any PodSecurityPolicy objects you do not want all pod-creating users to be able to use (NOTE: Privileged users that were making use of those policies will also lose access to those policies). For example:

pramerica
prato.it
praxi
prd.fr
prd.km
prd.mg
prequalifyme.today
prerelease.replit.dev
press
press.aero
press.cy
press.ma
press.se
presse.km
presse.ml
preview.csb.app
pri.ee
prime
primetel.cloud
principe.st
priv.at
priv.hu
priv.instances.scw.cloud
priv.me
priv.no
priv.pl
privatizehealthinsurance.net
pro
pro.az
pro.br

- **Security**
  - Increased pod-level security granularity (eg: Container Image Policies, AppArmor and `sysctl` support)
  - Increased cluster-level security granularity (eg: Access Review API)

## Features

- DRA device taints: `DeviceTaintRule` status provides information about the rule, including whether Pods still need to be evicted (`EvictionInProgress` condition). The newly added `None` effect can be used to preview what a `DeviceTaintRule` would do if it used the `NoExecute` effect and to taint devices (`device health`) without immediately affecting scheduling or running Pods. ([#134152](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/134152), [@pohly](https:...