- Extended resources requested by initContainers which are allocated using an automatic ResourceClaim now match the behavior of legacy device plugins, reusing the same resources requested by later sidecar initContainers or regular containers when possible, to minimize the total number of devices requested by the pod....

    }

    @Override
    public void forEach(Consumer<? super K> action) {
      checkNotNull(action);
      // avoids entry allocation for those maps that allocate entries on iteration
      map.forEach((k, v) -> action.accept(k));
    }

    @Override
    public int size() {
      return map().size();
    }

    @Override

	}

	resyncStatus := ResyncFailed
	defer func() {
		s.markStatus(resyncStatus, opts, objectAPI)
		globalSiteResyncMetrics.incBucket(opts, resyncStatus)
		s.workerCh <- struct{}{}
	}()
	// Allocate new results channel to receive ObjectInfo.
	objInfoCh := make(chan itemOrErr[ObjectInfo])
	cfg, err := getReplicationConfig(ctx, opts.bucket)
	if err != nil {

  for (int i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
    values[i] = TF_NewBuffer();
    status->status = MessageToBuffer(attr->list().shape(i), values[i]);
    if (!status->status.ok()) {
      // Delete everything allocated to far, the operation has failed.
      for (int j = 0; j <= i; ++j) {
        TF_DeleteBuffer(values[j]);
      }
      return;
    }
  }
}

      // independent of the initial capacity, except that it won't be lower than the threshold
      // computed from that capacity. Because the internal table is only allocated on the first
      // write, we won't see copying because of the new threshold. So it is always OK to use the
      // calculation here.
      return (int) ceil(expectedSize / 0.75);
    }