came skimming out, straight at the Footman's head:  it just
grazed his nose, and broke to pieces against one of the trees
behind him.

  `--or next day, maybe,' the Footman continued in the same tone,
exactly as if nothing had happened.

  `How am I to get in?' asked Alice again, in a louder tone.

  `ARE you to get in at all?' said the Footman.  `That's the

    assertSame(t, popLoggedThrowable());
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Can we replace makeLocalCache with a call to builder.build()? Some tests may
   * need access to LocalCache APIs, but maybe we can at least make makeLocalCache use
   * builder.build() and then cast?
   */

  private static <K, V> LocalCache<K, V> makeLocalCache(
      CacheBuilder<? super K, ? super V> builder) {

    assertSame(t, popLoggedThrowable());
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Can we replace makeLocalCache with a call to builder.build()? Some tests may
   * need access to LocalCache APIs, but maybe we can at least make makeLocalCache use
   * builder.build() and then cast?
   */

  private static <K, V> LocalCache<K, V> makeLocalCache(
      CacheBuilder<? super K, ? super V> builder) {

    combiner = null;
    // combiner should be collected even if the future it returns never completes.
    GcFinalization.awaitClear(combinerRef);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): maybe pass around TestFuture instances instead of
   * ListenableFuture instances
   */

  /**
   * A future in {@link TestFutureBatch} that also has a name for debugging purposes and a {@code

    combiner = null;
    // combiner should be collected even if the future it returns never completes.
    GcFinalization.awaitClear(combinerRef);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): maybe pass around TestFuture instances instead of
   * ListenableFuture instances
   */

  /**
   * A future in {@link TestFutureBatch} that also has a name for debugging purposes and a {@code

came skimming out, straight at the Footman's head:  it just
grazed his nose, and broke to pieces against one of the trees
behind him.

  `--or next day, maybe,' the Footman continued in the same tone,
exactly as if nothing had happened.

  `How am I to get in?' asked Alice again, in a louder tone.

  `ARE you to get in at all?' said the Footman.  `That's the

       * prototype checker's JDK. However, the checker still sees the return type as plain
       * `Enumeration<?>`, probably because of one of the following two bugs (and maybe those two
       * bugs are themselves just symptoms of the same underlying problem):
       *
       * https://github.com/typetools/checker-framework/issues/3030
       *