///

* Si la PR peut être simplifiée d'une certaine manière, vous pouvez le demander, mais il n'est pas nécessaire d'être trop pointilleux, il peut y avoir beaucoup de points de vue subjectifs (et j'aurai les miens aussi 🙈), donc il est préférable de vous concentrer sur les choses fondamentales.

### Tests { #tests }

* Aidez‑moi à vérifier que la PR a des **tests**.

    // these checks test alternative subjects. The test data contains an
    // alternative subject starting with a japanese kanji character. This is
    // not supported by Android because the underlying implementation from
    // harmony follows the definition from rfc 1034 page 10 for alternative
    // subject names. This causes the code to drop all alternative subjects.
    assertThat(verifier.verify("bar.com", session)).isTrue()

    void equalsAndHashCode_subjectSemantics() {
        Kerb5Authenticator a = new Kerb5Authenticator((Subject) null);
        Kerb5Authenticator b = new Kerb5Authenticator((Subject) null);

        // Both null subjects -> equal
        assertEquals(a, b);
        assertEquals(a.hashCode(), b.hashCode());

        // Mixed null/non-null -> not equal
        Kerb5Authenticator c = new Kerb5Authenticator(new Subject());

        assertEquals(orig.getUserDomain(), copy.getUserDomain());
        assertEquals(orig.getPassword(), copy.getPassword());

        // Test the cloning behavior with both null and non-null cached subjects
        if (first != null) {
            // If we got a valid subject, test that it's properly cached and cloned
            Subject cachedOrig = orig.getSubject();
            assertNotNull(cachedOrig);

pkg bytes, func Title //deprecated
pkg crypto/tls, method (*Conn) NetConn() net.Conn
pkg crypto/tls, type Config struct, PreferServerCipherSuites //deprecated
pkg crypto/x509, method (*CertPool) Subjects //deprecated
pkg debug/buildinfo, func Read(io.ReaderAt) (*debug.BuildInfo, error)
pkg debug/buildinfo, func ReadFile(string) (*debug.BuildInfo, error)
pkg debug/buildinfo, type BuildInfo = debug.BuildInfo

///

* If the PR can be simplified in a way, you can ask for that, but there's no need to be too picky, there might be a lot of subjective points of view (and I will have my own as well 🙈), so it's better if you can focus on the fundamental things.

### Tests { #tests }

* Help me check that the PR has **tests**.

includes changes suggested by tools.

We sometimes reject contributions due to the low quality of the submission
since low-quality submissions tend to take unreasonable effort to review
properly. Quality is rather subjective so it is hard to describe exactly how to
avoid this, but there are some basic steps you can take to reduce the chances
of rejection. Follow the guidelines listed above when preparing your changes.