unevaluatedProperties: Optional["SchemaOrBool"] = None
    # Ref: JSON Schema Validation 2020-12: https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/json-schema-validation.html#name-a-vocabulary-for-structural
    # A Vocabulary for Structural Validation
    type: Optional[str] = None
    enum: Optional[List[Any]] = None
    const: Optional[Any] = None
    multipleOf: Optional[float] = Field(default=None, gt=0)

		},
	}

	flags := c.PersistentFlags()
	flags.StringSliceVarP(&filenames, "filename", "f", nil, "Inputs of files to validate")
	flags.BoolVarP(&referential, "referential", "x", true, "Enable structural validation for policy and telemetry")
	_ = flags.MarkHidden("referential")
	return c
}

func warningToString(w validation.Warning) string {
	we, ok := w.(*multierror.Error)
	if ok {

  //
  // Network identity
  //

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} iff {@code object} is a {@link Network} that has the same elements and the
   * same structural relationships as those in this network.
   *
   * <p>Thus, two networks A and B are equal if <b>all</b> of the following are true:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>A and B have equal {@link #isDirected() directedness}.

  //
  // ValueGraph identity
  //

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} iff {@code object} is a {@link ValueGraph} that has the same elements and
   * the same structural relationships as those in this graph.
   *
   * <p>Thus, two value graphs A and B are equal if <b>all</b> of the following are true:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>A and B have equal {@link #isDirected() directedness}.

	} else {
		tx.Statement.Omits = columns
	}
	return
}

// MapColumns modify the column names in the query results to facilitate align to the corresponding structural fields
func (db *DB) MapColumns(m map[string]string) (tx *DB) {
	tx = db.getInstance()
	tx.Statement.ColumnMapping = m
	return
}

// Where add conditions
//

        }
      } else {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("Value already present in map: " + newValue);
      }
    }
    // we do *not* update insertion order, and it isn't a structural modification!
    deleteFromTableVToK(entry, Hashing.smearedHash(values[entry]));
    values[entry] = newValue;
    insertIntoTableVToK(entry, newValueHash);
  }

  /**

  boolean hasEdgeConnecting(EndpointPair<N> endpoints);

  //
  // Graph identity
  //

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} iff {@code object} is a {@link Graph} that has the same elements and the
   * same structural relationships as those in this graph.
   *
   * <p>Thus, two graphs A and B are equal if <b>all</b> of the following are true:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>A and B have equal {@link #isDirected() directedness}.

  boolean hasEdgeConnecting(EndpointPair<N> endpoints);

  //
  // Graph identity
  //

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} iff {@code object} is a {@link Graph} that has the same elements and the
   * same structural relationships as those in this graph.
   *
   * <p>Thus, two graphs A and B are equal if <b>all</b> of the following are true:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>A and B have equal {@link #isDirected() directedness}.

  //
  // Network identity
  //

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} iff {@code object} is a {@link Network} that has the same elements and the
   * same structural relationships as those in this network.
   *
   * <p>Thus, two networks A and B are equal if <b>all</b> of the following are true:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>A and B have equal {@link #isDirected() directedness}.

    * Porque las estructuras de datos de Pydantic son solo <abbr title='En español: ejemplares. Aunque a veces los llaman incorrectamente "instancias"'>instances</abbr> de clases que tu defines, el auto-completado, el linting, mypy y tu intuición deberían funcionar bien con tus datos validados.
* Valida **estructuras complejas**: