if (to instanceof WildcardType) {
          return; // Okay to say Foo is <?>
        }
        // Can't map from a raw class to anything other than itself or a wildcard.
        // You can't say "assuming String is Integer".
        // And we don't support "assuming String is T"; user has to say "assuming T is String".

        if (to instanceof WildcardType) {
          return; // Okay to say Foo is <?>
        }
        // Can't map from a raw class to anything other than itself or a wildcard.
        // You can't say "assuming String is Integer".
        // And we don't support "assuming String is T"; user has to say "assuming T is String".

     *
     * RFC 2388 is rather vague about how one should escape special characters in form-data
     * parameters, and as it turns out Firefox and Chrome actually do rather different things, and
     * both say in their comments that they're not really sure what the right approach is. We go
     * with Chrome's behavior (which also experimentally seems to match what IE does), but if you

          }
        };
    assertEquals("foo", future.get(0, SECONDS));
  }

  public void testEvilFuture_setFuture() throws Exception {
    RuntimeException exception = new RuntimeException("you didn't say the magic word!");
    AbstractFuture<String> evilFuture =
        new AbstractFuture<String>() {
          @Override
          public void addListener(Runnable r, Executor e) {
            throw exception;

                             * augment the addresses name's hashCode to distinguish those resolved by
                             * Lmhosts, WINS, or BCAST. Otherwise a failed query from say WINS would
                             * get pulled out of the cache for a BCAST on the same name.
                             */
                            response.addrEntry[0].hostName.srcHashCode = request.addr.hashCode();

          }
        };
    assertEquals("foo", future.get(0, SECONDS));
  }

  public void testEvilFuture_setFuture() throws Exception {
    RuntimeException exception = new RuntimeException("you didn't say the magic word!");
    AbstractFuture<String> evilFuture =
        new AbstractFuture<String>() {
          @Override
          public void addListener(Runnable r, Executor e) {
            throw exception;

              // We can't check that the key is mightContain() == false before the
              // put() because the key could have already been generated *or* the
              // bloom filter might say true even when it's not there (false
              // positive).
              bloomFilter.put(key);
              // False negative should *never* happen.
              assertThat(bloomFilter.mightContain(key)).isTrue();

    }
  }

  private static void assertAtLeastTimePassed(Stopwatch stopwatch, long expectedMillis) {
    long elapsedMillis = stopwatch.elapsed(MILLISECONDS);
    /*
     * The "+ 5" below is to permit, say, sleep(10) to sleep only 9 milliseconds. We see such
     * behavior sometimes when running these tests publicly as part of Guava. "+ 5" is probably more
     * generous than it needs to be.
     */
    assertTrue(

              // We can't check that the key is mightContain() == false before the
              // put() because the key could have already been generated *or* the
              // bloom filter might say true even when it's not there (false
              // positive).
              bloomFilter.put(key);
              // False negative should *never* happen.
              assertThat(bloomFilter.mightContain(key)).isTrue();

 * of as interfaces in every important sense. Each public class such as {@link ImmutableSet} is a
 * <i>type</i> offering meaningful behavioral guarantees. This is substantially different from the
 * case of (say) {@link HashSet}, which is an <i>implementation</i>, with semantics that were
 * largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as