}

    @Test
    @DisplayName("getRequest should return the same request instance")
    void testGetRequest() {
        // Verify getRequest returns the exact same instance
        SmbNegotiationRequest request = negotiation.getRequest();
        assertSame(mockRequest, request);

        // Verify multiple calls return the same instance
        assertSame(request, negotiation.getRequest());
    }

And these same full-stack generators were the base of the [**FastAPI** Project Generators](project-generation.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

/// info

Flask-apispec was created by the same Marshmallow developers.

///

/// check | Inspired **FastAPI** to

Generate the OpenAPI schema automatically, from the same code that defines serialization and validation.

///

You would have **one single `engine` object** for all your code to connect to the same database.

{* ../../docs_src/sql_databases/tutorial001_an_py310.py ln[14:18] hl[14:15,17:18] *}

Using `check_same_thread=False` allows FastAPI to use the same SQLite database in different threads. This is necessary as **one single request** could use **more than one thread** (for example in dependencies).

<img src="/img/tutorial/bigger-applications/image01.png">

## Include the same router multiple times with different `prefix` { #include-the-same-router-multiple-times-with-different-prefix }

You can also use `.include_router()` multiple times with the *same* router using different prefixes.

This could be useful, for example, to expose the same API under different prefixes, e.g. `/api/v1` and `/api/latest`.

This is the same mechanism used when you give permissions while logging in with Facebook, Google, GitHub, etc:

<img src="/img/tutorial/security/image11.png">

## JWT token with scopes { #jwt-token-with-scopes }

Now, modify the token *path operation* to return the scopes requested.

* **Machine Learning**: it normally requires lots of "matrix" and "vector" multiplications. Think of a huge spreadsheet with numbers and multiplying all of them together at the same time.

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("getConfig should return the provided configuration")
    void testGetConfig() {
        // When
        Configuration config = context.getConfig();

        // Then
        assertSame(mockConfig, config, "Should return the same configuration instance");
    }

    @Test

///

And we are using this model to declare our input and the same model to declare our output:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

Now, whenever a browser is creating a user with a password, the API will return the same password in the response.

In this case, it might not be a problem, because it's the same user sending the password.

constraints.LuhnCheck.message = La somme de contrôle Luhn Modulo 11 de {value} est incorrecte.
constraints.Mod10Check.message = La somme de contrôle Modulo 10 de {value} est incorrecte.
constraints.Mod11Check.message = La somme de contrôle Modulo 11 de {value} est incorrecte.
constraints.ModCheck.message = La somme de contrôle {modType} de {value} est incorrecte.
constraints.NotBlank.message = {item} est requis.

 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> instances of type {@code Multimap} may not implement {@link Object#equals} in
 * the way you expect. Multimaps containing the same key-value pairs, even in the same order, may or
 * may not be equal and may or may not have the same {@code hashCode}. The recommended subinterfaces
 * provide much stronger guarantees.
 *
 * <h3>Comparison to a map of collections</h3>
 *