<img src="/img/tutorial/bigger-applications/image01.png">

## Include the same router multiple times with different `prefix` { #include-the-same-router-multiple-times-with-different-prefix }

You can also use `.include_router()` multiple times with the *same* router using different prefixes.

This could be useful, for example, to expose the same API under different prefixes, e.g. `/api/v1` and `/api/latest`.

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("getRequest should return the same request instance")
    void testGetRequest() {
        // Verify getRequest returns the exact same instance
        SmbNegotiationRequest request = negotiation.getRequest();
        assertSame(mockRequest, request);

        // Verify multiple calls return the same instance
        assertSame(request, negotiation.getRequest());
    }

///

And we are using this model to declare our input and the same model to declare our output:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

Now, whenever a browser is creating a user with a password, the API will return the same password in the response.

In this case, it might not be a problem, because it's the same user sending the password.

"Hashing" means converting some content (a password in this case) into a sequence of bytes (just a string) that looks like gibberish.

Whenever you pass exactly the same content (exactly the same password) you get exactly the same gibberish.

But you cannot convert from the gibberish back to the password.

### Why use password hashing { #why-use-password-hashing }

And these same full-stack generators were the base of the [**FastAPI** Project Generators](project-generation.md).

/// info

Flask-apispec was created by the same Marshmallow developers.

///

/// check | Inspired **FastAPI** to

Generate the OpenAPI schema automatically, from the same code that defines serialization and validation.

///

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("getConfig should return the provided configuration")
    void testGetConfig() {
        // When
        Configuration config = context.getConfig();

        // Then
        assertSame(mockConfig, config, "Should return the same configuration instance");
    }

    @Test

        ProtwordsItem item4 = new ProtwordsItem(1, "word");

        // Same object
        assertTrue(item1.equals(item1));

        // Same input, different id
        assertTrue(item1.equals(item2));

        // Different input
        assertFalse(item1.equals(item3));

        // Same id and input
        assertTrue(item1.equals(item4));

        // Null object

    for (int i = 0; i < keyBits; i++) {
      int same = 0x0; // bitset for output bits with same values
      int diff = 0x0; // bitset for output bits with different values
      int count = 0;
      // originally was 2 * Math.log(...), making it try more times to avoid flakiness issues
      int maxCount = (int) (4 * Math.log(2 * keyBits * hashBits) + 1);
      while (same != 0xffffffff || diff != 0xffffffff) {

        StopwordsItem item2 = new StopwordsItem(1, "test");
        StopwordsItem item3 = new StopwordsItem(2, "test");
        StopwordsItem item4 = new StopwordsItem(1, "different");

        // Same input should have same hashCode regardless of id
        assertEquals(item1.hashCode(), item2.hashCode());
        assertEquals(item1.hashCode(), item3.hashCode());

        // Different input should have different hashCode

        // Second call should return cached value (same as first)
        Subject second = auth.getSubject();
        if (first == null && second == null) {
            // Both null - caching is working
            assertNull(second, "Second getSubject should return same result as first (both null)");
        } else if (first != null && second != null) {
            // Both non-null - should be same instance