case 2:
		return fmt.Sprintf("%s:%d and %s:%d", reason0, reason0Cnt, reason1, reason1Cnt)
	default:
		return fmt.Sprintf("%s:%d and %d(%d) more reasons", reason0, reason0Cnt, len(req.Reason)-1,
			req.Reason.Count()-reason0Cnt)
	}
}

func doSendPushes(stopCh <-chan struct{}, semaphore chan struct{}, queue *PushQueue) {
	for {
		select {
		case <-stopCh:
			return
		default:

	}

	if len(condition.Reason) == 0 {
		allErrs = append(allErrs, field.Required(fldPath.Child("reason"), "must be set"))
	} else {
		for _, currErr := range isValidConditionReason(condition.Reason) {
			allErrs = append(allErrs, field.Invalid(fldPath.Child("reason"), condition.Reason, currErr))
		}
		if len(condition.Reason) > maxReasonLen {

	podWithoutMissingExtendedResources := removeMissingExtendedResources(admitPod, nodeInfo)

	reasons := generalFilter(podWithoutMissingExtendedResources, nodeInfo)
	fit := len(reasons) == 0
	if !fit {
		reasons, err = w.admissionFailureHandler.HandleAdmissionFailure(admitPod, reasons)
		fit = len(reasons) == 0 && err == nil
		if err != nil {

			Reason: "valid,val:",
		}},
		validateErrs: func(t *testing.T, errs field.ErrorList) {

        NodeBuilder maybeByReason(String reason) {
            ignoreReasons.add(reason)
            this
        }

        NodeBuilder byConstraint(String reason = null) {
            if (reason == null) {
                reasons << ComponentSelectionCause.CONSTRAINT.defaultReason
            } else {
                reasons << "${ComponentSelectionCause.CONSTRAINT.defaultReason}: $reason".toString()
            }

    def "resolution result API gives access to dependency reasons in case of conflict"() {
        given:
        mavenRepo.with {
            def leaf1 = module('org.test', 'leaf', '1.0').publish()
            def leaf2 = module('org.test', 'leaf', '1.1').publish()
            module('org.test', 'a', '1.0')
                .dependsOn(leaf1, reason: 'first reason')
                .withModuleMetadata()
                .publish()

				}
				t.Logf("expecting the following differences from the example encoding on re-encode:\n%s", diff)
				t.Logf("reasons for encoding differences:")
				for _, reason := range tc.reasons {
					t.Logf("- %s", reason)
				}

			}

			if diff := cmp.Diff(expected, actual); diff != "" {
				t.Errorf("re-encoded object differs from expected:\n%s", diff)
			}
		})
	}

        def reasons = []
        invalidationDetails.changedFiles.each { file ->
            reasons.add("file '${file.replace('/', File.separator)}'")
        }
        if (invalidationDetails.changedGradleProperty) {
            reasons.add("the set of Gradle properties")
        }
        if (invalidationDetails.changedSystemProperty != null) {

		return failureReasons, nil
	}
	// InsufficientResourceError is not a reason to reject a critical pod.
	// Instead of rejecting, we free up resources to admit it, if no other reasons for rejection exist.
	nonResourceReasons := []lifecycle.PredicateFailureReason{}
	resourceReasons := []*admissionRequirement{}
	for _, reason := range failureReasons {
		if r, ok := reason.(*lifecycle.InsufficientResourceError); ok {

==== Selection Reasons

The "Selection reasons" section of the dependency insight report lists the reasons why a dependency was selected.
Have a look at the table below to understand the meaning of the different terms used:

.Terminology
[%header%autowidth,compact]
|===
| Reason    | Meaning

| (Absent)
| No reason other than a reference, direct or transitive, was present.