/**
   * Waits for the {@link Service} to reach the {@linkplain State#TERMINATED terminated state}.
   *
   * @throws IllegalStateException if the service {@linkplain State#FAILED fails}.
   * @since 15.0
   */
  void awaitTerminated();

  /**
   * Waits for the {@link Service} to reach a terminal state (either {@link Service.State#TERMINATED

  /**
   * Waits for the {@link Service} to reach the {@linkplain State#TERMINATED terminated state}.
   *
   * @throws IllegalStateException if the service {@linkplain State#FAILED fails}.
   * @since 15.0
   */
  void awaitTerminated();

  /**
   * Waits for the {@link Service} to reach a terminal state (either {@link Service.State#TERMINATED

  }

  /**
   * Waits for the all the services to reach a terminal state. After this method returns all
   * services will either be {@linkplain Service.State#TERMINATED terminated} or {@linkplain
   * Service.State#FAILED failed}.
   */
  public void awaitStopped() {
    state.awaitStopped();
  }

  /**
   * Waits for the all the services to reach a terminal state for no more than the given time. After

      // should never reach here!
      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }

    @Override
    public Entry<K, V> belowSamplesGreater() {
      // should never reach here!
      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }

    @Override
    public Entry<K, V> aboveSamplesLesser() {
      // should never reach here!
      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();

import org.opentest4j.TestAbortedException

/**
 * This test binds two different web servers (IPv4 and IPv6) to the same port, but on different
 * local IP addresses. Requests made to `127.0.0.1` will reach the IPv4 server, and requests made to
 * `::1` will reach the IPv6 server.
 *
 * By orchestrating two different servers with the same port but different IP addresses, we can
 * test what OkHttp does when both are reachable, or if only one is reachable.
 *

	globalDirSuffixWithSlash       = globalDirSuffix + slashSeparator

	// Add new global values here.
)

const (
	// Limit fields size (except file) to 1Mib since Policy document
	// can reach that size according to https://aws.amazon.com/articles/1434
	maxFormFieldSize = int64(1 * humanize.MiByte)

	// The maximum allowed time difference between the incoming request

    return Platform.stringIsNullOrEmpty(string);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a string, of length at least {@code minLength}, consisting of {@code string} prepended
   * with as many copies of {@code padChar} as are necessary to reach that length. For example,
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code padStart("7", 3, '0')} returns {@code "007"}
   *   <li>{@code padStart("2010", 3, '0')} returns {@code "2010"}
   * </ul>
   *

      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

  @Override
  public final void awaitTerminated() {
    monitor.enterWhenUninterruptibly(isStopped);
    try {
      checkCurrentState(TERMINATED);
    } finally {

   * free slot.
   *
   * The table size is capped because, when there are more threads
   * than CPUs, supposing that each thread were bound to a CPU,
   * there would exist a perfect hash function mapping threads to
   * slots that eliminates collisions. When we reach capacity, we
   * search for this mapping by randomly varying the hash codes of
   * colliding threads.  Because search is random, and collisions

   * reduced the available size of the buffer each time a call to read didn't fill up the available
   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */