}
    return total;
  }

  /** Max array length on JVM. */
  private static final int MAX_ARRAY_LEN = Integer.MAX_VALUE - 8;

  /** Large enough to never need to expand, given the geometric progression of buffer sizes. */
  private static final int TO_BYTE_ARRAY_DEQUE_SIZE = 20;

  /**
   * Returns a byte array containing the bytes from the buffers already in {@code bufs} (which have

      }
    } ]
  }, {
    "testId" : "org.gradle.performance.regression.android.AndroidIncrementalExecutionPerformanceTest.abi change",
    "groups" : [ {
      "testProject" : "nowInAndroidBuild",
      "coverage" : {
        "per_commit" : [ "linux", "windows", "macOs" ]
      }
    } ]
  }, {
    "testId" : "org.gradle.performance.regression.android.AndroidIncrementalExecutionPerformanceTest.abi change with configuration caching",

  "durations" : [ {
    "testProject" : "nowInAndroidBuild",
    "linux" : 445,
    "windows" : 479,
    "macOs" : 300
  }, {
    "testProject" : "santaTrackerAndroidBuild",
    "linux" : 416,
    "windows" : 590,
    "macOs" : 354
  } ]
}, {

    follow-ups. It independently shares connections when the IP addresses and certificates match,
    even if the host names do not. In 4.4.0 we introduced a regression where we shared a connection
    when certificates matched but the DNS addresses did not. This would only occur when following a
    redirect from one hostname to another, and where both hosts had common certificates.

    /*
     * We don't "need" to schedule a countDown() call at all here, but by doing
     * so, we come the closest we can to testing that the wait time is
     * appropriately decreased on each progressive await() call.
     */
    TimedLatch latch = new TimedLatch(/* countdownInMillis= */ LONG_DELAY_MS);
    repeatedlyInterruptTestThread(tearDownStack);
    latch.awaitUnsuccessfully(70);
    assertInterrupted();

        MinMaxPriorityQueue<Integer> q = MinMaxPriorityQueue.create(perm);
        q.removeAtForTesting(i);
        assertIntactUsingStartedWith(perm, q);
      }
    }
  }

  /** Regression test for bug found. */
  public void testCorrectOrdering_regression() {
    MinMaxPriorityQueue<Integer> q = MinMaxPriorityQueue.create(ImmutableList.of(3, 5, 1, 4, 7));

    val channel: String,
    val extraParameters: String = "",
) {
    PER_COMMIT(
        displayName = "Performance Regression Test",
        timeout = 420,
        channel = "commits",
    ),
    PER_DAY(
        displayName = "Slow Performance Regression Test",
        timeout = 420,
        channel = "commits",
    ),
    PER_WEEK(
        displayName = "Performance Experiment",

        MinMaxPriorityQueue<Integer> q = MinMaxPriorityQueue.create(perm);
        q.removeAtForTesting(i);
        assertIntactUsingStartedWith(perm, q);
      }
    }
  }

  /** Regression test for bug found. */
  public void testCorrectOrdering_regression() {
    MinMaxPriorityQueue<Integer> q = MinMaxPriorityQueue.create(ImmutableList.of(3, 5, 1, 4, 7));

    /*
     * We don't "need" to schedule a countDown() call at all here, but by doing
     * so, we come the closest we can to testing that the wait time is
     * appropriately decreased on each progressive await() call.
     */
    TimedLatch latch = new TimedLatch(/* countdownInMillis= */ LONG_DELAY_MS);
    repeatedlyInterruptTestThread(tearDownStack);
    latch.awaitUnsuccessfully(70);
    assertInterrupted();

    response2.body.close()
    assertThat(server.takeRequest().exchangeIndex).isEqualTo(0)
    assertThat(server.takeRequest().exchangeIndex).isEqualTo(0)
  }

  /**
   * Regression test for an edge case where closing response body in the HTTP engine doesn't release
   * the corresponding stream allocation. This test keeps those response bodies alive and reads