* ${project.name}FileName - changes the name of the file to write to in the directory
         * ${project.name}Content - changes the text to write to the output file.
         */
        void produceDirs() {
            producerTaskClassName = "DirProducer"
            producerConfig = """

            );
        }
    }

    private void collectValidationProblemsForConsumer(LocalTaskNode consumer, TypeValidationContext validationContext, String locationConsumedByThisTask, Collection<Node> producers) {
        producers.stream()
            .filter(producerNode -> hasNoSpecifiedOrder(producerNode, consumer))
            .filter(MissingTaskDependencyDetector::isEnabled)

        schema.withProducer(producer).selectionSchema.hasAttribute(attr2)
        schema.withProducer(producer).selectionSchema.hasAttribute(attr3)
    }

    def "uses the producers compatibility rules when the consumer does not express an opinion"() {
        def producer = new DefaultAttributesSchema(TestUtil.instantiatorFactory(), SnapshotTestUtil.isolatableFactory())

    tf_executor.fetch
  }
  func.return
}

// Check that we bring in TPUReplicatedInputOp operand producers.
// CHECK-LABEL: func @fuse_in_replicated_input_op
func.func @fuse_in_replicated_input_op(%arg0: tensor<i32>) {
  tf_executor.graph {
// CHECK: tf_executor.island
// CHECK-NEXT: = "tf.TPUReplicatedInput"

            result.assertTaskOrder(cleanBar.fullPath, generateBar.fullPath, generate.fullPath)
        }
    }

    def "multiple destroyer tasks listed on the command line followed by producers can run concurrently and are executed in the correct order"() {
        def foo = subproject(':foo')
        def bar = subproject(':bar')

        def cleanFoo = foo.task('cleanFoo').destroys('build/foo').shouldBlock()

 * use a framework. Frameworks automate the process, often adding features like monitoring,
 * debugging, and cancellation. Examples of frameworks include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li><a href="https://dagger.dev/producers.html">Dagger Producers</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>{@link java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture} / {@link java.util.concurrent.CompletionStage}
 * </h4>
 *

 * use a framework. Frameworks automate the process, often adding features like monitoring,
 * debugging, and cancellation. Examples of frameworks include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li><a href="https://dagger.dev/producers.html">Dagger Producers</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>{@link java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture} / {@link java.util.concurrent.CompletionStage}
 * </h4>
 *

     *
     *     println(copy.get())  // prints qux
     * </pre>
     * <p>
     * The copy doesn't share the producer of this property, but inherits producers of the current property value.
     *
     * @return the shallow copy of this property
     */
    public ProviderInternal<T> shallowCopy() {
        return new ShallowCopyProvider();
    }

                                     back_edge.RemovedEdges(), &shape_refiner));
  TF_RETURN_IF_ERROR(back_edge.Replace());

  // Currently information does not flow "backward" from consumers to producers
  // in the shape inference, but we consume the shapes in a second pass in case
  // backward information flow is added in the future.
  return StoreOutputShapes(*graph, shape_refiner, shape_info);
}

//
// IMPLEMENTATION
// --------------
//
// We traverse the graph minus backedges in reverse post order, mapping each
// node to the set of resource operation reaching that node.  Since we visit
// producers before consumers, we can construct the set of reaching operations
// by taking the union of the operations reaching the input nodes.  These
// "reaching resource operations" can then be used to create the pairs of