* This puts a much tighter budget on CPU, memory, latency, and throughput requirements than traditional Istio sidecars.

Ztunnel was not designed to be a feature-rich data plane.
Quite the opposite - an *aggressively* small feature set is the key feature that makes ztunnel viable.

        // has already been moved.
        parent = elementData(removeIndex);
      } else {
        parent = elementData(getParentIndex(removeIndex));
      }
      // bubble it up the opposite heap
      if (otherHeap.bubbleUpAlternatingLevels(crossOver, toTrickle) < removeIndex) {
        return new MoveDesc<>(toTrickle, parent);
      } else {
        return null;
      }
    }

  }

  public void testDeadlock_twoLocks() {
    // Establish an acquisition order of lockA -> lockB.
    lockA.lock();
    lockB.lock();
    lockA.unlock();
    lockB.unlock();

    // The opposite order should fail (Policies.THROW).
    PotentialDeadlockException firstException = null;
    lockB.lock();
    PotentialDeadlockException expected =

  }

  public void testDeadlock_twoLocks() {
    // Establish an acquisition order of lockA -> lockB.
    lockA.lock();
    lockB.lock();
    lockA.unlock();
    lockB.unlock();

    // The opposite order should fail (Policies.THROW).
    PotentialDeadlockException firstException = null;
    lockB.lock();
    PotentialDeadlockException expected =

        // has already been moved.
        parent = elementData(removeIndex);
      } else {
        parent = elementData(getParentIndex(removeIndex));
      }
      // bubble it up the opposite heap
      if (otherHeap.bubbleUpAlternatingLevels(crossOver, toTrickle) < removeIndex) {
        return new MoveDesc<>(toTrickle, parent);
      } else {
        return null;
      }
    }

     * constructor's. This is an arbitrary rule since no existing language spec mandates one way or
     * the other. From the declaration syntax, the class type parameter appears first, but the call
     * syntax may show up in opposite order such as {@code new <A>Foo<B>()}.
     */
    @Override
    public final TypeVariable<?>[] getTypeParameters() {
      TypeVariable<?>[] declaredByClass = getDeclaringClass().getTypeParameters();

     * execute all peer settings logic on the writer thread. This relies on the fact that the
     * writer task queue won't reorder tasks; otherwise settings could be applied in the opposite
     * order than received.
     */
    fun applyAndAckSettings(
      clearPrevious: Boolean,
      settings: Settings,
    ) {
      var delta: Long
      var streamsToNotify: Array<Http2Stream>?

  // `OrderedReady`, where pods are created in increasing order (pod-0, then
  // pod-1, etc) and the controller will wait until each pod is ready before
  // continuing. When scaling down, the pods are removed in the opposite order.
  // The alternative policy is `Parallel` which will create pods in parallel
  // to match the desired scale without waiting, and on scale down will delete
  // all pods at once.
  // +optional

  // `OrderedReady`, where pods are created in increasing order (pod-0, then
  // pod-1, etc) and the controller will wait until each pod is ready before
  // continuing. When scaling down, the pods are removed in the opposite order.
  // The alternative policy is `Parallel` which will create pods in parallel
  // to match the desired scale without waiting, and on scale down will delete
  // all pods at once.
  // +optional

But still, FastAPI got quite some inspiration from Requests.

**Requests** is a library to *interact* with APIs (as a client), while **FastAPI** is a library to *build* APIs (as a server).

They are, more or less, at opposite ends, complementing each other.

Requests has a very simple and intuitive design, it's very easy to use, with sensible defaults. But at the same time, it's very powerful and customizable.