/** Ciphers in order we observed directly on the socket. */
  private lateinit var handshakeEnabledCipherSuites: List<String>

  /** Ciphers in order we observed on sslSocketFactory defaults. */
  private lateinit var defaultEnabledCipherSuites: List<String>

  /** Ciphers in order we observed on sslSocketFactory supported. */

        int falseCount = 0;
        for (int i = 0; i < readerThreadCount; i++) {
            for (Boolean observed : observations[i]) {
                if (!observed) {
                    falseCount++;
                }
            }
        }
        assertTrue("Some threads should have observed alive=false", falseCount > 0);
    }

    /**

   * only become known via CAS failures, convergence can be slow,
   * and because threads are typically not bound to CPUS forever,
   * may not occur at all. However, despite these limitations,
   * observed contention rates are typically low in these cases.
   *
   * It is possible for a Cell to become unused when threads that
   * once hashed to it terminate, as well as in the case where

  // * Future completion can be observed if the waitersField field contains a TOMBSTONE

  // Timed Get
  // There are a few design constraints to consider
  // * We want to be responsive to small timeouts, unpark() has non trivial latency overheads (I
  //   have observed 12 micros on 64-bit linux systems to wake up a parked thread). So if the

   * only become known via CAS failures, convergence can be slow,
   * and because threads are typically not bound to CPUS forever,
   * may not occur at all. However, despite these limitations,
   * observed contention rates are typically low in these cases.
   *
   * It is possible for a Cell to become unused when threads that
   * once hashed to it terminate, as well as in the case where

</pre>

<p>
the assignment to <code>a</code> is not followed by
any synchronization event, so it is not guaranteed to be
observed by any other goroutine.
In fact, an aggressive compiler might delete the entire <code>go</code> statement.
</p>

<p>
If the effects of a goroutine must be observed by another goroutine,
use a synchronization mechanism such as a lock or channel
communication to establish a relative ordering.
</p>

            }
          };
      executor.execute(errorTask);
      service.execute(barrierTask); // submit directly to the service
      // the barrier task runs after the error task so we know that the error has been observed by
      // SequentialExecutor by the time the barrier is satisfied
      barrier.await(1, SECONDS);
      executor.execute(barrierTask);
      // timeout means the second task wasn't even tried

            }
          };
      executor.execute(errorTask);
      service.execute(barrierTask); // submit directly to the service
      // the barrier task runs after the error task so we know that the error has been observed by
      // SequentialExecutor by the time the barrier is satisfied
      barrier.await(1, SECONDS);
      executor.execute(barrierTask);
      // timeout means the second task wasn't even tried

        }
      }
      return;
    }

    /*
     * This is an unsynchronized read! After the read, the function returns immediately or acquires
     * the lock to check again. Since an IDLE state was observed inside the preceding synchronized
     * block, and reference field assignment is atomic, this may save reacquiring the lock when
     * another thread or the worker task has cleared the count and set the state.
     *

    server.requireClientAuth()
    val call = client.newCall(Request.Builder().url(server.url("/")).build())
    assertFailsWith<IOException> {
      call.execute()
    }

    // Observed Events are variable
    // JDK 14
    // CallStart, ProxySelectStart, ProxySelectEnd, DnsStart, DnsEnd, ConnectStart, SecureConnectStart,