*       C}, instance methods are skipped for nulls test.
   *   <li>Nulls test is not performed on method return values unless the method is a visible static
   *       factory method whose return type is {@code C} or {@code C}'s subtype.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>In all cases, if {@code C} needs custom logic for testing nulls, you can add an explicit

       * we're copying into a `contents` array whose type allows it to contain nulls. Still, it's
       * worth noting that we promise not to put nulls into the array in the first `size` elements.
       * We uphold that promise here because our callers promise that `elements` will not contain
       * nulls in its first `n` elements.
       */
      System.arraycopy(elements, 0, contents, size, n);
      size += n;

   *       C}, instance methods are skipped for nulls test.
   *   <li>Nulls test is not performed on method return values unless the method is a visible static
   *       factory method whose return type is {@code C} or {@code C}'s subtype.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>In all cases, if {@code C} needs custom logic for testing nulls, you can add an explicit

    return asImmutableList(array);
  }

  /** Views the array as an immutable list. Checks for nulls; does not copy. */
  private static <E> ImmutableList<E> construct(Object... elements) {
    return asImmutableList(checkElementsNotNull(elements));
  }

  /**
   * Views the array as an immutable list. Does not check for nulls; does not copy.
   *
   * <p>The array must be internally created.
   */

       * we're copying into a `contents` array whose type allows it to contain nulls. Still, it's
       * worth noting that we promise not to put nulls into the array in the first `size` elements.
       * We uphold that promise here because our callers promise that `elements` will not contain
       * nulls in its first `n` elements.
       */
      System.arraycopy(elements, 0, contents, size, n);
      size += n;

  }

  /*
   * All the ContiguousSet generators below manually reject nulls here. In principle, we'd like to
   * defer that to Range, since it's ContiguousSet.create() that's used to create the sets. However,
   * that gets messy here, and we already have null tests for Range.
   */

  /*
   * These generators also rely on consecutive integer inputs (not necessarily in order, but no

                    }
                    return transform(fromList, removeFirst);
                  }
                })
            .named("Lists.transform, random access, no nulls")
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ANY,
                ListFeature.REMOVE_OPERATIONS,
                CollectionFeature.SERIALIZABLE,
                CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_QUERIES)

    initThreeCopies();
    assertSetCountDecreasingFailure(e0(), 1);
  }

  // setCount with nulls:

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  @CollectionFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_REMOVE, ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES})
  public void testSetCount_removeNull_nullSupported() {
    initCollectionWithNullElement();
    assertSetCount(null, 0);
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(
      value = {SUPPORTS_ADD, ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES},

    @Test
    void testLsarDomainInfoEncodeDecodeWithNulls() throws NdrException {
        // Create a domain info with null fields
        lsarpc.LsarDomainInfo domainInfo = new lsarpc.LsarDomainInfo();
        domainInfo.name = new rpc.unicode_string();
        domainInfo.name.buffer = null;
        domainInfo.sid = null;

        // Encode to buffer
        byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];

        when(mockDelegate.getMaximumVersion()).thenReturn(null);

        // When & Then - should handle nulls gracefully
        assertNull(delegatingConfig.getRandom(), "Should return null when delegate returns null");
        assertNull(delegatingConfig.getLocalAddr(), "Should return null when delegate returns null");
        assertNull(delegatingConfig.getNetbiosHostname(), "Should return null when delegate returns null");