nesting := 0
	var tokens []Token
	for {
		tok := in.Stack.Next()
		if tok == scanner.EOF || tok == '\n' {
			in.Error("unterminated arg list invoking macro:", macro.name)
		}
		if nesting == 0 && (tok == ')' || tok == ',') {
			return tokens, tok
		}
		if tok == '(' {
			nesting++
		}
		if tok == ')' {
			nesting--
		}

        System.setProperty("var2", "value2");

        String value = "${var1}-${var2}";
        assertEquals("value1-value2", ResourceUtil.resolve(value));

        // Test nested-like patterns (but not actual nesting)
        value = "${var1${var2}}"; // The ${var2} part gets replaced first
        assertEquals("${var1value2}", ResourceUtil.resolve(value));

        // Test with special characters in replacement

			if tok == '\n' || tok == ';' || (nesting == 0 && (tok == ',' || tok == ':')) {
				if tok == ':' {
					// Remember this location so we can swap the operands below.
					if colon >= 0 {
						p.errorf("invalid ':' in operand")
						return word, cond, operands, true
					}
					colon = len(operands)
				}
				break
			}
			if tok == '(' || tok == '[' {
				nesting++
			}
			if tok == ')' || tok == ']' {

      function = null;
    }

    /*
     * If set()/setValue() throws an Error, we let it propagate. Why? The most likely Error is a
     * StackOverflowError (from deep transform(..., directExecutor()) nesting), and calling
     * setException(stackOverflowError) would fail:
     *
     * - If the stack overflowed before set()/setValue() could even store the result in the output

 *      * response ([responseFailed])
 *        * headers ([responseHeadersStart], [responseHeadersEnd])
 *        * body ([responseBodyStart], [responseBodyEnd])
 *
 * This nesting is typical but not strict. For example, when calls use "Expect: continue" the
 * request body start and end events occur within the response header events. Similarly,

      function = null;
    }

    /*
     * If set()/setValue() throws an Error, we let it propagate. Why? The most likely Error is a
     * StackOverflowError (from deep transform(..., directExecutor()) nesting), and calling
     * setException(stackOverflowError) would fail:
     *
     * - If the stack overflowed before set()/setValue() could even store the result in the output

     */
    @Override
    public int getFlags() {
        return this.mechContext.getFlags();
    }

    @Override
    public boolean isSupported(final ASN1ObjectIdentifier mechanism) {
        // prevent nesting
        return false;
    }

    /**
     * Determines what mechanism is being used for this context.
     *
     * @return the Oid of the mechanism being used
     */

   *   <li>{@code ImmutableList.of(2, "C")}
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>The result is guaranteed to be in the "traditional", lexicographical order for Cartesian
   * products that you would get from nesting for loops:
   *
   * {@snippet :
   * for (B b0 : lists.get(0)) {
   *   for (B b1 : lists.get(1)) {
   *     ...
   *     ImmutableList<B> tuple = ImmutableList.of(b0, b1, ...);
   *     // operate on tuple

 * <ul>
 *   <li>for an unnested {@code lock()} and {@code unlock()}, a cycle detecting lock takes 38ns as
 *       opposed to the 24ns taken by a plain lock.
 *   <li>for nested locking, the cost increases with the depth of the nesting:
 *       <ul>
 *         <li>2 levels: average of 64ns per lock()/unlock()
 *         <li>3 levels: average of 77ns per lock()/unlock()
 *         <li>4 levels: average of 99ns per lock()/unlock()

Sebastián Ramírez <******@****.***> 1731896744 +0100