```

////

## Editor-Unterstützung überall

Und Sie erhalten Editor-Unterstützung überall.

Selbst für Dinge in Listen:

<img src="/img/tutorial/body-nested-models/image01.png">

Sie würden diese Editor-Unterstützung nicht erhalten, wenn Sie direkt mit `dict`, statt mit Pydantic-Modellen arbeiten würden.

	}

	var find1 Value
	err := DB.Joins("Nested").Joins("Nested.Join").Preload("Nested.Preloads").First(&find1, value1.ID).Error
	if err != nil {
		t.Errorf("failed to find value, got err: %v", err)
	}
	AssertEqual(t, find1, value1)

	var find2 Value
	// Joins will automatically add Nested queries.
	err = DB.Joins("Nested.Join").Preload("Nested.Preloads").First(&find2, value2.ID).Error
	if err != nil {

```

////

## Универсальная поддержка редактора

И вы получаете поддержку редактора везде.

Даже для элементов внутри списков:

<img src="/img/tutorial/body-nested-models/image01.png">

Вы не могли бы получить такую поддержку редактора, если бы работали напрямую с `dict`, а не с моделями Pydantic.

	if err := DB.First(&User{}, "name = ?", user2.Name).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Should not find rollbacked nested record")
	}
}

func TestDisabledNestedTransaction(t *testing.T) {
	var (
		user  = *GetUser("transaction-nested", Config{})
		user1 = *GetUser("transaction-nested-1", Config{})
		user2 = *GetUser("transaction-nested-2", Config{})
	)

				"88d4266fd4e6338d13b845fcf289579d209c897823b9217da3e161936f031589",
			},
		},
		{
			desc:       "Nested hash reader NewReader() should merge.",
			src:        mustReader(t, bytes.NewReader([]byte("abcd")), 4, "", "", 4),
			size:       4,
			actualSize: 4,
		},
		{
			desc:       "Incorrect sha256, nested",
			src:        mustReader(t, bytes.NewReader([]byte("abcd")), 4, "", "", 4),
			size:       4,
			actualSize: 4,

	users := []User{
		{
			Name: "nested-joins-1",
			Manager: &User{
				Name: "nested-joins-manager-1",
				Company: Company{
					Name: "nested-joins-manager-company-1",
				},
				NamedPet: &Pet{
					Name: "nested-joins-manager-namepet-1",
					Toy: Toy{
						Name: "nested-joins-manager-namepet-toy-1",
					},
				},
			},

							}
						} else {
							matchedFieldCount[column] = 1
						}
					} else if names := utils.SplitNestedRelationName(column); len(names) > 1 { // has nested relation
						if rel, ok := sch.Relationships.Relations[names[0]]; ok {
							subNameCount := len(names)
							// nested relation fields
							relFields := make([]*schema.Field, 0, subNameCount-1)
							relFields = append(relFields, rel.Field)

It can't handle nested models very well. So, if the JSON body in the request is a JSON object that has inner fields that in turn are nested JSON objects, it cannot be properly documented and validated.

/// check | "Inspired **FastAPI** to"

Use Python types to have great editor support.

def test_nested_router():
    app = FastAPI()

    router = APIRouter(prefix="/nested")

    @router.get("/test")
    async def test(var: Annotated[str, Query()] = "bar"):
        return {"foo": var}

    app.include_router(router)

    client = TestClient(app)

    response = client.get("/nested/test")
    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {"foo": "bar"}

                        attributes.put(name, parseArray(jsonParser));
                    } else if (jsonParser.getCurrentToken() == JsonToken.START_OBJECT) {
                        // Handle nested object type
                        attributes.put(name, parseObject(jsonParser));
                    } else {
                        // Handle primitive types (string, number, boolean, etc.)