labels.user_pager=Pager
labels.pager=Pager
labels.user_street=Street
labels.street=Street
labels.user_postalCode=Postal Code
labels.postalCode=Postal Code
labels.user_physicalDeliveryOfficeName=Office
labels.physicalDeliveryOfficeName=Office
labels.user_destinationIndicator=Destination Indicator
labels.destinationIndicator=Destination Indicator
labels.user_internationaliSDNNumber=International ISDN Number

         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();
        }

labels.user_pager=Pager
labels.pager=Pager
labels.user_street=Street
labels.street=Street
labels.user_postalCode=Postal Code
labels.postalCode=Postal Code
labels.user_physicalDeliveryOfficeName=Office
labels.physicalDeliveryOfficeName=Office
labels.user_destinationIndicator=Destination Indicator
labels.destinationIndicator=Destination Indicator
labels.user_internationaliSDNNumber=International ISDN Number

   * Powerpoint</a> presentations.
   */
  public static final MediaType MICROSOFT_POWERPOINT =
      createConstant(APPLICATION_TYPE, "vnd.ms-powerpoint");

  /**
   * <a

         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();
        }

   * Powerpoint</a> presentations.
   */
  public static final MediaType MICROSOFT_POWERPOINT =
      createConstant(APPLICATION_TYPE, "vnd.ms-powerpoint");

  /**
   * <a

   * {@code factory.get()} does.
   *
   * <p>Call this method only when the simpler factory methods in classes like {@link
   * HashBasedTable} and {@link TreeBasedTable} won't suffice.
   *
   * <p>The views returned by the {@code Table} methods {@link Table#column}, {@link
   * Table#columnKeySet}, and {@link Table#columnMap} have iterators that don't support {@code

  }

  /**
   * ReadWriteLock implementation whose read and write locks retain a reference back to this lock.
   * Otherwise, a reference to just the read lock or just the write lock would not suffice to ensure
   * the {@code ReadWriteLock} is retained.
   */
  private static final class WeakSafeReadWriteLock implements ReadWriteLock {
    private final ReadWriteLock delegate;

    WeakSafeReadWriteLock() {

      // Just extract the high 64 bits (assuming the rest is user-modifiable).
      addressAsLong = ByteBuffer.wrap(ip6.getAddress(), 0, 8).getLong();
    }

    // Many strategies for hashing are possible. This might suffice for now.
    int coercedHash = Hashing.murmur3_32_fixed().hashLong(addressAsLong).asInt();

    // Squash into 224/4 Multicast and 240/4 Reserved space (i.e. 224/3).
    coercedHash |= 0xe0000000;

      // Just extract the high 64 bits (assuming the rest is user-modifiable).
      addressAsLong = ByteBuffer.wrap(ip6.getAddress(), 0, 8).getLong();
    }

    // Many strategies for hashing are possible. This might suffice for now.
    int coercedHash = Hashing.murmur3_32_fixed().hashLong(addressAsLong).asInt();

    // Squash into 224/4 Multicast and 240/4 Reserved space (i.e. 224/3).
    coercedHash |= 0xe0000000;