- **FTP**: FTP server crawling with authentication
- **SMB/CIFS**: Windows network shares
- **Storage**: Cloud storage systems (MinIO, S3-compatible)

### Content Formats

#### Office Documents
- Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint)
- OpenOffice/LibreOffice documents
- RTF, WordPerfect

#### PDFs and Images
- PDF documents (text and metadata extraction)
- Images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF, BMP)

			<artifactId>tika-parser-microsoft-module</artifactId>
			<version>${tika.version}</version>
		</dependency>
		<dependency>
			<groupId>org.apache.tika</groupId>
			<artifactId>tika-parser-miscoffice-module</artifactId>
			<version>${tika.version}</version>
		</dependency>
		<dependency>
			<groupId>org.apache.tika</groupId>
			<artifactId>tika-parser-news-module</artifactId>

         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();
        }

   * Powerpoint</a> presentations.
   */
  public static final MediaType MICROSOFT_POWERPOINT =
      createConstant(APPLICATION_TYPE, "vnd.ms-powerpoint");

  /**
   * <a

   * {@code factory.get()} does.
   *
   * <p>Call this method only when the simpler factory methods in classes like {@link
   * HashBasedTable} and {@link TreeBasedTable} won't suffice.
   *
   * <p>The views returned by the {@code Table} methods {@link Table#column}, {@link
   * Table#columnKeySet}, and {@link Table#columnMap} have iterators that don't support {@code

„_[...] Ich verwende **FastAPI** heutzutage sehr oft. [...] Ich habe tatsächlich vor, es für alle **ML-Services meines Teams bei Microsoft** zu verwenden. Einige davon werden in das Kernprodukt **Windows** und einige **Office**-Produkte integriert._“

<div style="text-align: right; margin-right: 10%;">Kabir Khan – <strong>Microsoft</strong> <a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/26"><small>(Ref.)</small></a></div>

---

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {
            manageArtifact(node, managedVersions, listeners);
        }

        List<ResolutionNode> previousNodes = resolvedArtifacts.get(key);

"_[...] I'm using **FastAPI** a ton these days. [...] I'm actually planning to use it for all of my team's **ML services at Microsoft**. Some of them are getting integrated into the core **Windows** product and some **Office** products._"

<div style="text-align: right; margin-right: 10%;">Kabir Khan - <strong>Microsoft</strong> <a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/26"><small>(ref)</small></a></div>

---

  }

  /**
   * ReadWriteLock implementation whose read and write locks retain a reference back to this lock.
   * Otherwise, a reference to just the read lock or just the write lock would not suffice to ensure
   * the {@code ReadWriteLock} is retained.
   */
  private static final class WeakSafeReadWriteLock implements ReadWriteLock {
    private final ReadWriteLock delegate;

    WeakSafeReadWriteLock() {

"_[...] В последнее время я много где использую **FastAPI**. [...] На самом деле я планирую использовать его для всех **ML-сервисов моей команды в Microsoft**. Некоторые из них интегрируются в основной продукт **Windows**, а некоторые — в продукты **Office**._"

<div style="text-align: right; margin-right: 10%;">Kabir Khan - <strong>Microsoft</strong> <a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/26"><small>(ref)</small></a></div>

---